Re: Xentrace on Xilinx ARM

[Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1459 bytes --]

On Tue, 2016-03-08 at 18:32 +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 08/03/16 18:28, Paul Sujkov wrote:
> > Regarding ARM build, I'm using xenalyze as both host tool (x86
> > build, e.g. for gnuplot scatterplot graphs) and target tool (ARM,
> > for fast summary check); but since we're working with Xen 4.5, I'm
> > building it outside Xen source tree with a custom Makefile.
>  
> xenalyse should be able to be run as a separate tool, and on a
> different architecture.  All it does is annotate the binary trace
> file.
> 
It sure should. However, I would not expect the ARM binary, built when
building of the tools for ARM, to work on an x86 box (either dom0,
devbox, or whatever). That's what I think Ben was asking about, and
what I was responding to.

> I don't think there is much change between what's now in-tree and
> what was out of tree in the 4.5 timeframe.
> 
Apart from my recent enhancement in events displaying, I'm quite sure I
remember Coverity uncovering something pretty important about how some
stats were being handled, and that being fixed not more that a couple
of weeks ago.

Ah, here it is: ebdba150bff1d914805d60efa576337bbef0c305

Regards,
Dario
-- 
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 181 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 126 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel