From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hetzner.pbcl.net (mail.pbcl.net [88.198.119.4]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C856FF97 for ; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.183.132.60] (helo=e130) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1agAaL-0005gO-OQ for openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org; Wed, 16 Mar 2016 13:29:58 +0100 Message-ID: <1458131361.2038.28.camel@pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:29:21 +0000 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: X.org licenses X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:29:58 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit This morning it came to my notice that libxdmcp, and a bunch of other files (mostly, though not exclusively, in xorg-libs) contain things like: LICENSE = "MIT-style" It's not very clear to me whether "MIT-style" is meant to mean "an unspecified license in the same general style as the MIT one" or whether it refers to a single concrete license. (There is no MIT-style in meta/files/common-licenses.) Does anybody happen to know what the intended meaning of this license is? thanks p.