From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@suse.com>
To: Jiri Kosina <jikos@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Chen <hzpeterchen@gmail.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>,
Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Linux-pm mailing list <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Should suspend plug low-level devices?
Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2016 11:29:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1458210566.4312.14.camel@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1603171119260.3656@cbobk.fhfr.pm>
On Thu, 2016-03-17 at 11:20 +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>
> > Yes, but you are making the assumption that only the kthreads a driver
> > started are causing IO to it. That is a tall one.
> >
> > - logging
> > - network
> > - device discovery on busses
> > - detection of media
> > - knfsd
> >
> > All these things cause IO and I probably forgot some. Defined semantics
> > for the threads a driver starts are a good idea, but it leaves out the
> > really hard cases.
>
> So you named only one specific kthread here (knfsd), so let's focus on
> that one. Where is that one currently being frozen during suspend?
In svc_recv()
That concentration, however, is problematic. We can target anything
specific, but the point is, do we know what is running?
Regards
Oliver
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-17 10:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-23 3:20 Freezable workqueue blocks non-freezable workqueue during the system resume process Peter Chen
2016-02-23 9:47 ` Peter Chen
2016-02-23 15:34 ` Alan Stern
2016-02-24 7:24 ` Peter Chen
2016-02-25 22:01 ` Tejun Heo
2016-02-26 6:19 ` Peter Chen
2016-03-02 16:00 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-03 9:33 ` Jan Kara
2016-03-11 17:56 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-14 7:22 ` Jan Kara
2016-03-14 14:37 ` Alan Stern
2016-03-15 9:25 ` Jan Kara
2016-03-16 15:00 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-16 15:37 ` Should suspend plug low-level devices? Alan Stern
2016-03-16 16:31 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-16 16:35 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-16 16:39 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-16 23:18 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-03-16 23:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-16 23:42 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-03-16 23:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2016-03-17 7:50 ` Oliver Neukum
2016-03-17 8:02 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-03-17 8:20 ` Oliver Neukum
2016-03-17 8:35 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-03-17 9:12 ` Oliver Neukum
2016-03-17 10:20 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-03-17 10:29 ` Oliver Neukum [this message]
2016-03-17 10:36 ` Jiri Kosina
2016-03-17 18:55 ` Alan Stern
2016-03-18 20:29 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-17 0:05 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-17 18:58 ` Alan Stern
2016-03-18 20:25 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-17 18:53 ` Alan Stern
2016-03-18 20:29 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-16 16:34 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-17 18:51 ` Alan Stern
2016-03-18 20:32 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-18 21:06 ` Alan Stern
2016-03-20 18:29 ` Tejun Heo
2016-03-21 14:38 ` Alan Stern
2016-03-30 17:09 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1458210566.4312.14.camel@suse.com \
--to=oneukum@suse.com \
--cc=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=hzpeterchen@gmail.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=jikos@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.