All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paul Moore <pmoore@redhat.com>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Richard Guy Briggs <rgb@redhat.com>,
	linux-audit@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>, Al Viro <aviro@redhat.com>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] [RFC] seccomp: give BPF x32 bit when restoring x32 filter
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 12:11:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1458762.ra4TnS54ZN@sifl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53BF62AA.20105@zytor.com>

On Thursday, July 10, 2014 09:06:02 PM H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Incidentally: do seccomp users know that on an x86-64 system you can
> recevie system calls from any of the x86 architectures, regardless of
> how the program is invoked?  (This is unusual, so normally denying those
> "alien" calls is the right thing to do.)

I obviously can't speak for all seccomp users, but libseccomp handles this by 
checking the seccomp_data->arch value at the start of the filter and killing 
(by default) any non-native architectures.  If you want, you can change this 
default behavior or add support for other architectures (e.g. create a filter 
that allows both x86-64 and x32 but disallows x86, or any combination of the 
three for that matter).

-- 
paul moore
security and virtualization @ redhat

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-11 16:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-11  3:38 [PATCH 0/3] [RFC] X32: fix syscall_get_nr while not breaking seccomp BPF Richard Guy Briggs
2014-07-11  3:38 ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-07-11  3:38 ` [PATCH 1/3] [RFC] audit: add AUDIT_ARCH_X86_X32 arch definition Richard Guy Briggs
2014-07-11 16:15   ` Paul Moore
2014-07-11  3:38 ` [PATCH 2/3] [RFC] seccomp: give BPF x32 bit when restoring x32 filter Richard Guy Briggs
2014-07-11  3:38   ` Richard Guy Briggs
2014-07-11  4:06   ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-11 16:11     ` Paul Moore [this message]
2014-07-11 16:13       ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-11 16:16       ` Eric Paris
2014-07-11 16:21         ` Paul Moore
2014-07-11 16:23           ` Eric Paris
2014-07-11 16:30             ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-11 16:32             ` Paul Moore
2014-07-11 18:31               ` Eric Paris
2014-07-11 19:36                 ` Paul Moore
2014-07-11 22:48                   ` Kees Cook
2014-07-11 22:52                     ` Kees Cook
2014-07-11 22:55                       ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-11 23:02                         ` Kees Cook
2014-07-11 23:12                     ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-11 16:36   ` Paul Moore
2014-07-11 16:44     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-11  3:38 ` [PATCH 3/3] [RFC] Revert "x86: remove the x32 syscall bitmask from syscall_get_nr()" Richard Guy Briggs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1458762.ra4TnS54ZN@sifl \
    --to=pmoore@redhat.com \
    --cc=aviro@redhat.com \
    --cc=eparis@redhat.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-audit@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rgb@redhat.com \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.