From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id EC4DDE008EE; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:05:50 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AA2E00566 for ; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 15:05:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u2TM5iAY025812; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:05:44 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id onywsm95TYG9; Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:05:43 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u2TM5fxB025808 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:05:42 +0100 Message-ID: <1459289141.21672.41.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Holger Freyther , poky@yoctoproject.org Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 23:05:41 +0100 In-Reply-To: <541E63F7-405C-4FB4-A264-074F8BB31E62@freyther.de> References: <541E63F7-405C-4FB4-A264-074F8BB31E62@freyther.de> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: uninnative and md5 checksum? X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion & patch submission for meta-yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 22:05:51 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Wed, 2016-03-23 at 12:23 +0100, Holger Freyther wrote: > Hi, > > our jenkins started to fail with yocto-master and I started to take a > look. I noticed that uninative binaries are being downloaded from the > network. It is not great to download binaries from the network and > execute but fair enough there is a checksum. > > But the choice of md5 as checksum is a bit odd (md5 and sha1 are > effectively broken), can this be moved to sha3 or sha256sum? We use the fetcher's checksuming support so I guess sha256 would be the better choice. It can be changed, at the expense of a bit of pain making sure all the changes work smoothly. Cheers, Richard