All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
To: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>,
	Noam Camus <noamc@ezchip.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-serial@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	guohanjun@huawei.com, xuwei5@hisilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: fix wrong logic in dw8250_check_lcr()
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 12:58:03 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459504683.5907.151.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459501618-21021-1-git-send-email-wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>

On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 17:06 +0800, Kefeng Wang wrote:
> Commit cdcea058e510("serial: 8250_dw: Avoid serial_outx code
> duplicate
> with new dw8250_check_lcr()") introduce a wrong logic when write val
> to
> LCR reg. When CONFIG_64BIT enabled, __raw_writeq is used
> unconditionally.
> 
> But for !PORT_OCTEON, we better to use coincident write func.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com>
> ---
> 
> We met following calltrace twice, if the change is not necessary,
> correct me,
> and any advice will be appreciated, thanks.

So, does this fix you issue? If it does than perhaps you need to Cc
stable@ and put Fixes tag as well.

> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/8250/8250_dw.c
> @@ -104,15 +104,16 @@ static void dw8250_check_lcr(struct uart_port
> *p, int value)
>  		dw8250_force_idle(p);
>  
>  #ifdef CONFIG_64BIT
> -		__raw_writeq(value & 0xff, offset);
> -#else
> +		if (p->type == PORT_OCTEON)
> +			__raw_writeq(value & 0xff, offset);
> +		else
> +#endif

You may also get rid of this one, like

if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_64BIT) && p->type == PORT_OCTEON)
 ...
else if
...

>  		if (p->iotype == UPIO_MEM32)
>  			writel(value, offset);
>  		else if (p->iotype == UPIO_MEM32BE)
>  			iowrite32be(value, offset);
>  		else
>  			writeb(value, offset);
> -#endif
>  	}
>  	/*
>  	 * FIXME: this deadlocks if port->lock is already held

-- 
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Intel Finland Oy

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-01  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-01  9:06 [PATCH] serial: 8250_dw: fix wrong logic in dw8250_check_lcr() Kefeng Wang
2016-04-01  9:06 ` Kefeng Wang
2016-04-01  9:58 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2016-04-01 10:19   ` Kefeng Wang
2016-04-01 10:19     ` Kefeng Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1459504683.5907.151.camel@linux.intel.com \
    --to=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
    --cc=heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=noamc@ezchip.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=xuwei5@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.