From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from hetzner.pbcl.net (mail.pbcl.net [88.198.119.4]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E3376312 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2016 10:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blundell.swaffham-prior.co.uk ([91.216.112.25] helo=e130.local) by hetzner.pbcl.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1alvtI-0006UI-Ta; Fri, 01 Apr 2016 12:01:21 +0200 Message-ID: <1459504875.2322.70.camel@pbcl.net> From: Phil Blundell To: Ross Burton Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 11:01:15 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1459504783.2322.69.camel@pbcl.net> References: <1459501616-4775-1-git-send-email-ross.burton@intel.com> <1459504783.2322.69.camel@pbcl.net> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.12.9-1+b1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] meta: remove obsolete architectures X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2016 10:01:20 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 10:59 +0100, Phil Blundell wrote: > On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 10:06 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: > > Remove ancient and obsolete architectures from openembedded-core, they've no > > real users and are causing complications that can be now removed. > > It seems a bit harsh, or possibly wishful thinking on Intel's part, to > describe most of these as "ancient and obsolete". Oh, hah, I just realised what the date is. Removing SPARC still seems like a fine idea though :-) p.