From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Dario Faggioli <dario.faggioli@citrix.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 for Xen 4.7 4/4] xl: enable per-VCPU
 parameter for RTDS
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 15:51:38 +0200
Message-ID: <1459518698.5082.256.camel@citrix.com>
References: <1459486786-3085-1-git-send-email-lichong659@gmail.com>
 <1459486786-3085-5-git-send-email-lichong659@gmail.com>
 <1459516518.5082.254.camel@citrix.com> <20160401134310.GB27636@citrix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============3065565435470692913=="
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
In-Reply-To: <20160401134310.GB27636@citrix.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
 <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Sender: "Xen-devel" <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
To: Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>
Cc: Chong Li <chong.li@wustl.edu>, Sisu Xi <xisisu@gmail.com>, george.dunlap@eu.citrix.com, xen-devel@lists.xen.org, Meng Xu <mengxu@cis.upenn.edu>, Chong Li <lichong659@gmail.com>, dgolomb@seas.upenn.edu
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

--===============3065565435470692913==
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6ZzHWLP+ZxxnNYqlqQb7"

--=-6ZzHWLP+ZxxnNYqlqQb7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 14:43 +0100, Wei Liu wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 03:15:18PM +0200, Dario Faggioli wrote:
> >=C2=A0
> > I've found only a couple of style issues. I don't feel like
> > blocking
> > the series or asking to resend... perhaps they can be fixed during
> > commit? Or I'm up for sending a cleanup patch myself (which would
> > not
> > introduce any functional change), as soon as this hit the repo.
> >=20
> IMHO a separate patch is better. Adjusting during committing in such
> large patch is error prone, plus there is huge backlog to be applied
> at
> the moment.
>=20
Ok, it makes sense.

I'll queue this up.

Regards,
Dario
--=20
<<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli
Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)


--=-6ZzHWLP+ZxxnNYqlqQb7
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEABECAAYFAlb+fOsACgkQk4XaBE3IOsTXxACfV9kwIfelNzCPH2n6U9vSHQko
YS8AoJaPMKH3IA2u/c2LhAsmuzMM/LJ3
=iVho
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-6ZzHWLP+ZxxnNYqlqQb7--


--===============3065565435470692913==
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: inline

X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs
IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMueGVuLm9y
Zy94ZW4tZGV2ZWwK

--===============3065565435470692913==--