[PATCH v2] nvme: add missing lock nesting notation

[mlin@kernel.org (Ming Lin)]

From: Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>

When unloading driver, nvme_disable_io_queues() calls nvme_delete_queue()
that sends nvme_admin_delete_cq command to admin sq. So when the command
completed, the lock acquired by nvme_irq() actually belongs to admin queue.

While the lock that nvme_del_cq_end() trying to acquire belongs to io queue.
So it will not deadlock.

This patch adds lock nesting notation to fix following report.

[  109.840952] =============================================
[  109.846379] [ INFO: possible recursive locking detected ]
[  109.851806] 4.5.0+ #180 Tainted: G            E
[  109.856533] ---------------------------------------------
[  109.861958] swapper/0/0 is trying to acquire lock:
[  109.866771]  (&(&nvmeq->q_lock)->rlock){-.....}, at: [<ffffffffc0820bc6>] nvme_del_cq_end+0x26/0x70 [nvme]
[  109.876535]
[  109.876535] but task is already holding lock:
[  109.882398]  (&(&nvmeq->q_lock)->rlock){-.....}, at: [<ffffffffc0820c2b>] nvme_irq+0x1b/0x50 [nvme]
[  109.891547]
[  109.891547] other info that might help us debug this:
[  109.898107]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[  109.898107]
[  109.904056]        CPU0
[  109.906515]        ----
[  109.908974]   lock(&(&nvmeq->q_lock)->rlock);
[  109.913381]   lock(&(&nvmeq->q_lock)->rlock);
[  109.917787]
[  109.917787]  *** DEADLOCK ***
[  109.917787]
[  109.923738]  May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[  109.923738]
[  109.930558] 1 lock held by swapper/0/0:
[  109.934413]  #0:  (&(&nvmeq->q_lock)->rlock){-.....}, at: [<ffffffffc0820c2b>] nvme_irq+0x1b/0x50 [nvme]
[  109.944010]
[  109.944010] stack backtrace:
[  109.948389] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Tainted: G            E   4.5.0+ #180
[  109.955734] Hardware name: Dell Inc. OptiPlex 7010/0YXT71, BIOS A15 08/12/2013
[  109.962989]  0000000000000000 ffff88011e203c38 ffffffff81383d9c ffffffff81c13540
[  109.970478]  ffffffff826711d0 ffff88011e203ce8 ffffffff810bb429 0000000000000046
[  109.977964]  0000000000000046 0000000000000000 0000000000b2e597 ffffffff81f4cb00
[  109.985453] Call Trace:
[  109.987911]  <IRQ>  [<ffffffff81383d9c>] dump_stack+0x85/0xc9
[  109.993711]  [<ffffffff810bb429>] __lock_acquire+0x19b9/0x1c60
[  109.999575]  [<ffffffff810b6d1d>] ? trace_hardirqs_off+0xd/0x10
[  110.005524]  [<ffffffff810b386d>] ? complete+0x3d/0x50
[  110.010688]  [<ffffffff810bb760>] lock_acquire+0x90/0xf0
[  110.016029]  [<ffffffffc0820bc6>] ? nvme_del_cq_end+0x26/0x70 [nvme]
[  110.022418]  [<ffffffff81772afb>] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x4b/0x60
[  110.028632]  [<ffffffffc0820bc6>] ? nvme_del_cq_end+0x26/0x70 [nvme]
[  110.035019]  [<ffffffffc0820bc6>] nvme_del_cq_end+0x26/0x70 [nvme]
[  110.041232]  [<ffffffff8135b485>] blk_mq_end_request+0x35/0x60
[  110.047095]  [<ffffffffc0821ad8>] nvme_complete_rq+0x68/0x190 [nvme]
[  110.053481]  [<ffffffff8135b53f>] __blk_mq_complete_request+0x8f/0x130
[  110.060043]  [<ffffffff8135b611>] blk_mq_complete_request+0x31/0x40
[  110.066343]  [<ffffffffc08209e3>] __nvme_process_cq+0x83/0x240 [nvme]
[  110.072818]  [<ffffffffc0820c35>] nvme_irq+0x25/0x50 [nvme]
[  110.078419]  [<ffffffff810cdb66>] handle_irq_event_percpu+0x36/0x110
[  110.084804]  [<ffffffff810cdc77>] handle_irq_event+0x37/0x60
[  110.090491]  [<ffffffff810d0ea3>] handle_edge_irq+0x93/0x150
[  110.096180]  [<ffffffff81012306>] handle_irq+0xa6/0x130
[  110.101431]  [<ffffffff81011abe>] do_IRQ+0x5e/0x120
[  110.106333]  [<ffffffff8177384c>] common_interrupt+0x8c/0x8c

Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn at suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lin <ming.l at ssi.samsung.com>
---
 drivers/nvme/host/pci.c | 8 +++++++-
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

v2:
  - add a little comment
  - add Johannes's review tag

diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
index e578362..d141692 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/pci.c
@@ -1571,7 +1571,13 @@ static void nvme_del_cq_end(struct request *req, int error)
 	if (!error) {
 		unsigned long flags;
 
-		spin_lock_irqsave(&nvmeq->q_lock, flags);
+		/*
+		 * We might be called with the AQ q_lock held
+		 * and the I/O queue q_lock should always
+		 * nest inside the AQ one.
+		 */
+		spin_lock_irqsave_nested(&nvmeq->q_lock, flags,
+					SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);
 		nvme_process_cq(nvmeq);
 		spin_unlock_irqrestore(&nvmeq->q_lock, flags);
 	}
-- 
1.9.1