From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Petr Holasek <pholasek@redhat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ksm: introduce ksm_max_page_sharing per page deduplication limit
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 16:33:49 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459974829.28435.6.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1447181081-30056-2-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 840 bytes --]
On Tue, 2015-11-10 at 19:44 +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> Without a max deduplication limit for each KSM page, the list of the
> rmap_items associated to each stable_node can grow infinitely
> large.
>
> During the rmap walk each entry can take up to ~10usec to process
> because of IPIs for the TLB flushing (both for the primary MMU and
> the
> secondary MMUs with the MMU notifier). With only 16GB of address
> space
> shared in the same KSM page, that would amount to dozens of seconds
> of
> kernel runtime.
Silly question, but could we fix this problem
by building up a bitmask of all CPUs that have
a page-with-high-mapcount mapped, and simply
send out a global TLB flush to those CPUs once
we have changed the page tables, instead of
sending out IPIs at every page table change?
--
All rights reversed
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-06 20:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-11-10 18:44 RFC [PATCH 0/1] ksm: introduce ksm_max_page_sharing per page deduplication limit Andrea Arcangeli
2015-11-10 18:44 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Andrea Arcangeli
2015-12-09 16:19 ` Petr Holasek
2015-12-09 17:15 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2015-12-09 18:10 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2015-12-10 16:06 ` Petr Holasek
2015-12-11 0:31 ` Andrew Morton
2016-01-14 23:36 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-01-16 17:49 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-01-16 18:00 ` Arjan van de Ven
2016-01-18 8:14 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-01-18 14:43 ` Arjan van de Ven
2016-01-18 9:10 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-01-18 9:45 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-01-18 17:46 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-03-17 21:34 ` Hugh Dickins
2016-03-17 21:50 ` Andrew Morton
2016-03-18 16:27 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-01-18 11:01 ` Mel Gorman
2016-01-18 22:19 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-01-19 10:43 ` Mel Gorman
2016-04-06 20:33 ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2016-04-06 22:02 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-09-21 15:12 ` Gavin Guo
2016-09-21 15:34 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2016-09-22 10:48 ` Gavin Guo
2016-10-28 6:26 ` Gavin Guo
2016-10-28 18:31 ` Andrea Arcangeli
2017-04-20 3:14 ` Gavin Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1459974829.28435.6.camel@redhat.com \
--to=riel@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=pholasek@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.