All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1460185149.2982.6.camel@intel.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index f6a7ec2..b611c58 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,30 +1,30 @@
 On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 17:06 -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:
 > So these are the patches needed to enable tunnel segmentation
 > offloads on
-> the igb, igbvf, ixgbe, and ixgbevf drivers.? In addition this patch
+> the igb, igbvf, ixgbe, and ixgbevf drivers.  In addition this patch
 > extends
 > the i40e and i40evf drivers to include segmentation support for
 > tunnels
 > with outer checksums.
 > 
-> The net performance gain for these patches are pretty significant.?
+> The net performance gain for these patches are pretty significant. 
 > In the
 > case of i40e a tunnel with outer checksums showed the following
 > improvement:
-> Throughput Throughput? Local Local?? Result?
-> ?????????? Units?????? CPU?? Service Tag????
-> ?????????????????????? Util? Demand?????????
-> ?????????????????????? %????????????????????
-> 14066.29?? 10^6bits/s? 3.49? 0.651?? "before"?
-> 20618.16?? 10^6bits/s? 3.09? 0.393?? "after"
+> Throughput Throughput  Local Local   Result 
+>            Units       CPU   Service Tag    
+>                        Util  Demand         
+>                        %                    
+> 14066.29   10^6bits/s  3.49  0.651   "before" 
+> 20618.16   10^6bits/s  3.09  0.393   "after"
 > 
 > For ixgbe similar results were seen:
-> Throughput Throughput? Local? Local?? Result?
-> ?????????? Units?????? CPU??? Service Tag????
-> ?????????????????????? Util?? Demand?????????
-> ?????????????????????? %???????????????
-> 12879.89?? 10^6bits/s? 10.00? 0.763?? "before"
-> 14286.77?? 10^6bits/s? 5.74?? 0.395?? "after"?
+> Throughput Throughput  Local  Local   Result 
+>            Units       CPU    Service Tag    
+>                        Util   Demand         
+>                        %               
+> 12879.89   10^6bits/s  10.00  0.763   "before"
+> 14286.77   10^6bits/s  5.74   0.395   "after" 
 > 
 > These patches all rely on the TSO_MANGLEID and GSO_PARTIAL patches so
 > I
@@ -34,12 +34,5 @@ On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 17:06 -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:
 Sorry I did not see this until after I tried applying your series. :-(
 
 Maybe the two dependent patches should have been in the series, so I
-and others do not waste their time. ?Or not send this until the two
+and others do not waste their time.  Or not send this until the two
 patches were accepted.
--------------- next part --------------
-A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
-Name: signature.asc
-Type: application/pgp-signature
-Size: 819 bytes
-Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
-URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20160408/1e0d1721/attachment-0001.asc>
diff --git a/N1/2.bin b/N1/2.bin
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..6bc009b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/N1/2.bin
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
+Version: GnuPG v2
+
+iQIcBAABCgAGBQJXCKg9AAoJEOVv75VaS+3OY7AP/jRrM9a7fgchgA1EiGCPppCT
+fC5gD+MZTKSfMQXM+NyDJDAijGX9wVw1VQBZqG20RW/mfQkC4BVudqoIpfFfvXAU
+oqvpO+bBcRu9zvgyhjqG7q9yeGLNV59QzXiaf63Hwdikq7WZuF2PFKrHTD+rbBtm
+boUeI6udBX5Sfddv04BMt++oqKrNicMg5FP90AH9789AXxp6QxqO/LA1HHQG1Q9T
+kNFamIcrewNPsOh+a4/yUC85jaL1k5OjkDZ28DGVHN3AyWTjj2V4s82dlKRwfU3f
+GWTFdINauOxXfCi/SwPghZBa5DW/pAE0y26CxCCnzjgTeOkIEI2FODkEHS7OyETc
+02OfiusP6KZFgytvCaI9pCLO8zB1PeEKvK7ABZKQM2BSiCNzFmdDrBuyPyZbN4t9
+H2GVAOkM1qEOHGaT//PV3o0xG5YfdBc/L5ZbhFjEK1yNU35qoGClb9BPbrpAKTha
+mwpOP/t7RR6yB0sXBWpbm2gkbFneNy2Tbr+Bic2XMR4lnSMiVvOAkQqyRzAwvjlH
+h8lFh/Pq92vkrL0ygyfNCBI7OAW33pwGcr7pBzRRfwuYJOhcC9vMYWvZ5q58DF7P
+qoH0wCXYyQWq95W3lyPOiuhOjyQdsx0oTAjdKx+Np6Y9t8ucZXGjTybALaYzqpyK
+CEgFBlhAor19OZxpkeJE
+=Dfm3
+-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
diff --git a/N1/2.hdr b/N1/2.hdr
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..da6d245
--- /dev/null
+++ b/N1/2.hdr
@@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
+Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
+Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part
+Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index bc94a0b..e61a022 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,38 +1,46 @@
  "ref\020160408203013.12838.63429.stgit@ahduyck-xeon-server\0"
  "ref\020160408210103.13096.77973.stgit@ahduyck-xeon-server\0"
  "From\0Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>\0"
- "Subject\0[Intel-wired-lan] [next-queue PATCH 0/3] Add support for GSO partial to Intel NIC drivers\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [next-queue PATCH 0/3] Add support for GSO partial to Intel NIC drivers\0"
  "Date\0Fri, 08 Apr 2016 23:59:09 -0700\0"
- "To\0intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org\0"
- "\00:1\0"
+ "To\0Alexander Duyck <aduyck@mirantis.com>"
+  herbert@gondor.apana.org.au
+  tom@herbertland.com
+  jesse@kernel.org
+  alexander.duyck@gmail.com
+  edumazet@google.com
+  intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
+  netdev@vger.kernel.org
+ " davem@davemloft.net\0"
+ "\01:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "On Fri, 2016-04-08 at 17:06 -0400, Alexander Duyck wrote:\n"
  "> So these are the patches needed to enable tunnel segmentation\n"
  "> offloads on\n"
- "> the igb, igbvf, ixgbe, and ixgbevf drivers.? In addition this patch\n"
+ "> the igb, igbvf, ixgbe, and ixgbevf drivers.\302\240 In addition this patch\n"
  "> extends\n"
  "> the i40e and i40evf drivers to include segmentation support for\n"
  "> tunnels\n"
  "> with outer checksums.\n"
  "> \n"
- "> The net performance gain for these patches are pretty significant.?\n"
+ "> The net performance gain for these patches are pretty significant.\302\240\n"
  "> In the\n"
  "> case of i40e a tunnel with outer checksums showed the following\n"
  "> improvement:\n"
- "> Throughput Throughput? Local Local?? Result?\n"
- "> ?????????? Units?????? CPU?? Service Tag????\n"
- "> ?????????????????????? Util? Demand?????????\n"
- "> ?????????????????????? %????????????????????\n"
- "> 14066.29?? 10^6bits/s? 3.49? 0.651?? \"before\"?\n"
- "> 20618.16?? 10^6bits/s? 3.09? 0.393?? \"after\"\n"
+ "> Throughput Throughput\302\240 Local Local\302\240\302\240 Result\302\240\n"
+ "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240 Units\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240 CPU\302\240\302\240 Service Tag\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\n"
+ "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240 Util\302\240 Demand\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\n"
+ "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240 %\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\n"
+ "> 14066.29\302\240\302\240 10^6bits/s\302\240 3.49\302\240 0.651\302\240\302\240 \"before\"\302\240\n"
+ "> 20618.16\302\240\302\240 10^6bits/s\302\240 3.09\302\240 0.393\302\240\302\240 \"after\"\n"
  "> \n"
  "> For ixgbe similar results were seen:\n"
- "> Throughput Throughput? Local? Local?? Result?\n"
- "> ?????????? Units?????? CPU??? Service Tag????\n"
- "> ?????????????????????? Util?? Demand?????????\n"
- "> ?????????????????????? %???????????????\n"
- "> 12879.89?? 10^6bits/s? 10.00? 0.763?? \"before\"\n"
- "> 14286.77?? 10^6bits/s? 5.74?? 0.395?? \"after\"?\n"
+ "> Throughput Throughput\302\240 Local\302\240 Local\302\240\302\240 Result\302\240\n"
+ "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240 Units\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240 CPU\302\240\302\240\302\240 Service Tag\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\n"
+ "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240 Util\302\240\302\240 Demand\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\n"
+ "> \302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240 %\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\302\240\n"
+ "> 12879.89\302\240\302\240 10^6bits/s\302\240 10.00\302\240 0.763\302\240\302\240 \"before\"\n"
+ "> 14286.77\302\240\302\240 10^6bits/s\302\240 5.74\302\240\302\240 0.395\302\240\302\240 \"after\"\302\240\n"
  "> \n"
  "> These patches all rely on the TSO_MANGLEID and GSO_PARTIAL patches so\n"
  "> I\n"
@@ -42,14 +50,28 @@
  "Sorry I did not see this until after I tried applying your series. :-(\n"
  "\n"
  "Maybe the two dependent patches should have been in the series, so I\n"
- "and others do not waste their time. ?Or not send this until the two\n"
- "patches were accepted.\n"
- "-------------- next part --------------\n"
- "A non-text attachment was scrubbed...\n"
- "Name: signature.asc\n"
- "Type: application/pgp-signature\n"
- "Size: 819 bytes\n"
- "Desc: This is a digitally signed message part\n"
- URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20160408/1e0d1721/attachment-0001.asc>
+ "and others do not waste their time. \302\240Or not send this until the two\n"
+ patches were accepted.
+ "\01:2\0"
+ "fn\0signature.asc\0"
+ "d\0This is a digitally signed message part\0"
+ "b\0"
+ "-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----\n"
+ "Version: GnuPG v2\n"
+ "\n"
+ "iQIcBAABCgAGBQJXCKg9AAoJEOVv75VaS+3OY7AP/jRrM9a7fgchgA1EiGCPppCT\n"
+ "fC5gD+MZTKSfMQXM+NyDJDAijGX9wVw1VQBZqG20RW/mfQkC4BVudqoIpfFfvXAU\n"
+ "oqvpO+bBcRu9zvgyhjqG7q9yeGLNV59QzXiaf63Hwdikq7WZuF2PFKrHTD+rbBtm\n"
+ "boUeI6udBX5Sfddv04BMt++oqKrNicMg5FP90AH9789AXxp6QxqO/LA1HHQG1Q9T\n"
+ "kNFamIcrewNPsOh+a4/yUC85jaL1k5OjkDZ28DGVHN3AyWTjj2V4s82dlKRwfU3f\n"
+ "GWTFdINauOxXfCi/SwPghZBa5DW/pAE0y26CxCCnzjgTeOkIEI2FODkEHS7OyETc\n"
+ "02OfiusP6KZFgytvCaI9pCLO8zB1PeEKvK7ABZKQM2BSiCNzFmdDrBuyPyZbN4t9\n"
+ "H2GVAOkM1qEOHGaT//PV3o0xG5YfdBc/L5ZbhFjEK1yNU35qoGClb9BPbrpAKTha\n"
+ "mwpOP/t7RR6yB0sXBWpbm2gkbFneNy2Tbr+Bic2XMR4lnSMiVvOAkQqyRzAwvjlH\n"
+ "h8lFh/Pq92vkrL0ygyfNCBI7OAW33pwGcr7pBzRRfwuYJOhcC9vMYWvZ5q58DF7P\n"
+ "qoH0wCXYyQWq95W3lyPOiuhOjyQdsx0oTAjdKx+Np6Y9t8ucZXGjTybALaYzqpyK\n"
+ "CEgFBlhAor19OZxpkeJE\n"
+ "=Dfm3\n"
+ "-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----\n"
 
-85f56241465986a12cc67677729ea439539f169adfb3d2b2cb200c4dd12d2543
+2feaccb874370fe47521ecc12ab4fa6cab66a343211e8dff785cfa8015f24460

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.