From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: shli@fb.com, artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, neilb@suse.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "RAID5: check_reshape() shouldn't call mddev_suspend" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 10:28:42 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <146030932259243@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
RAID5: check_reshape() shouldn't call mddev_suspend
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
raid5-check_reshape-shouldn-t-call-mddev_suspend.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 27a353c026a879a1001e5eac4bda75b16262c44a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2016 17:38:28 -0800
Subject: RAID5: check_reshape() shouldn't call mddev_suspend
From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
commit 27a353c026a879a1001e5eac4bda75b16262c44a upstream.
check_reshape() is called from raid5d thread. raid5d thread shouldn't
call mddev_suspend(), because mddev_suspend() waits for all IO finish
but IO is handled in raid5d thread, we could easily deadlock here.
This issue is introduced by
738a273 ("md/raid5: fix allocation of 'scribble' array.")
Reported-and-tested-by: Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++++
drivers/md/raid5.h | 2 ++
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -2091,6 +2091,14 @@ static int resize_chunks(struct r5conf *
unsigned long cpu;
int err = 0;
+ /*
+ * Never shrink. And mddev_suspend() could deadlock if this is called
+ * from raid5d. In that case, scribble_disks and scribble_sectors
+ * should equal to new_disks and new_sectors
+ */
+ if (conf->scribble_disks >= new_disks &&
+ conf->scribble_sectors >= new_sectors)
+ return 0;
mddev_suspend(conf->mddev);
get_online_cpus();
for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
@@ -2112,6 +2120,10 @@ static int resize_chunks(struct r5conf *
}
put_online_cpus();
mddev_resume(conf->mddev);
+ if (!err) {
+ conf->scribble_disks = new_disks;
+ conf->scribble_sectors = new_sectors;
+ }
return err;
}
@@ -6414,6 +6426,12 @@ static int raid5_alloc_percpu(struct r5c
}
put_online_cpus();
+ if (!err) {
+ conf->scribble_disks = max(conf->raid_disks,
+ conf->previous_raid_disks);
+ conf->scribble_sectors = max(conf->chunk_sectors,
+ conf->prev_chunk_sectors);
+ }
return err;
}
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.h
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.h
@@ -510,6 +510,8 @@ struct r5conf {
* conversions
*/
} __percpu *percpu;
+ int scribble_disks;
+ int scribble_sectors;
#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
struct notifier_block cpu_notify;
#endif
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from shli@fb.com are
queue-4.4/raid10-include-bio_end_io_list-in-nr_queued-to-prevent-freeze_array-hang.patch
queue-4.4/md-multipath-don-t-hardcopy-bio-in-.make_request-path.patch
queue-4.4/raid5-revert-e9e4c377e2f563-to-fix-a-livelock.patch
queue-4.4/raid1-include-bio_end_io_list-in-nr_queued-to-prevent-freeze_array-hang.patch
queue-4.4/raid5-check_reshape-shouldn-t-call-mddev_suspend.patch
queue-4.4/md-raid5-compare-apples-to-apples-or-sectors-to-sectors.patch
queue-4.4/md-raid5-preserve-stripe_preread_active-in-break_stripe_batch_list.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-04-10 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=146030932259243@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
--cc=neilb@suse.com \
--cc=shli@fb.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.