From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dario Faggioli Subject: Re: xenpm and scheduler Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2016 12:24:47 +0200 Message-ID: <1460543087.13871.124.camel@citrix.com> References: <1460448609.13871.104.camel@citrix.com> <20160412134140.GB27920@localhost.localdomain> , <20160412170815.GA5771@char.us.oracle.com> ,<1460495122.13871.119.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0450873812523241784==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Sender: "Xen-devel" To: tutu sky , Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Cc: Meng Xu , "Xen-devel@lists.xen.org" List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org --===============0450873812523241784== Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-hpsVaPpDTtTZmZtw5+pU" --=-hpsVaPpDTtTZmZtw5+pU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2016-04-13 at 08:21 +0000, tutu sky wrote: > Dario, let me try it in real hardware and i'll back reporting here. I > know that there are some distros which are suitable to be dom0: > http://wiki.xenproject.org/wiki/Dom0_Kernels_for_Xen > I think i choose my distro correctly (ubuntu 14.04 LTS) and i can see > xen related configurations in its .config file. >=20 I think Ubuntu 14.04 would be fine. If I'd have to choose, I'd use an even more recent one. > i thought as same as you but after reading devel lists and people's > problem with this feature, i noticed maybe using xenpm needs make > some modification about acpi in dom0's .config file, which leads to > kernel building again. I'm not sure now and after running my setup on > a real hardware, i'll back to report here. > those people who encountered problems, used real hardware. >=20 I don't know what issues you are talking about, and whether they may be related to Ubuntu 14.04, and/or to the dom0 kernel version shipped with it. Again, I'd suggest just going for something "current", no big deal if it's not LTS. Fedora 23, or a recent OpenSUSE, or Ubuntu 15.10... I'm pretty sure you'll be able to get a setup on which you can try to use xenpm quite quickly with any of them. Dario --=20 <> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK) --=-hpsVaPpDTtTZmZtw5+pU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEABECAAYFAlcOHm8ACgkQk4XaBE3IOsQBsgCfZf4GwRjIya16pvJyHNOuROJ9 3qoAoJrm9SCOA1nLHSoz4ndkEmsdV7UH =HO6O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-hpsVaPpDTtTZmZtw5+pU-- --===============0450873812523241784== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KWGVuLWRldmVs IG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdApYZW4tZGV2ZWxAbGlzdHMueGVuLm9yZwpodHRwOi8vbGlzdHMueGVuLm9y Zy94ZW4tZGV2ZWwK --===============0450873812523241784==--