All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: g.nault@alphalink.fr, davem@davemloft.net, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ppp: ensure file->private_data can't be overridden" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 10:06:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460826414158120@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    ppp: ensure file->private_data can't be overridden

to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     ppp-ensure-file-private_data-can-t-be-overridden.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From foo@baz Sat Apr 16 10:02:53 PDT 2016
From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
Date: Mon, 14 Mar 2016 21:17:16 +0100
Subject: ppp: ensure file->private_data can't be overridden

From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>

[ Upstream commit e8e56ffd9d2973398b60ece1f1bebb8d67b4d032 ]

Locking ppp_mutex must be done before dereferencing file->private_data,
otherwise it could be modified before ppp_unattached_ioctl() takes the
lock. This could lead ppp_unattached_ioctl() to override ->private_data,
thus leaking reference to the ppp_file previously pointed to.

v2: lock all ppp_ioctl() instead of just checking private_data in
    ppp_unattached_ioctl(), to avoid ambiguous behaviour.

Fixes: f3ff8a4d80e8 ("ppp: push BKL down into the driver")
Signed-off-by: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@alphalink.fr>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
 drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c |   31 +++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ static int get_filter(void __user *arg,
 
 static long ppp_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
 {
-	struct ppp_file *pf = file->private_data;
+	struct ppp_file *pf;
 	struct ppp *ppp;
 	int err = -EFAULT, val, val2, i;
 	struct ppp_idle idle;
@@ -577,9 +577,14 @@ static long ppp_ioctl(struct file *file,
 	void __user *argp = (void __user *)arg;
 	int __user *p = argp;
 
-	if (!pf)
-		return ppp_unattached_ioctl(current->nsproxy->net_ns,
-					pf, file, cmd, arg);
+	mutex_lock(&ppp_mutex);
+
+	pf = file->private_data;
+	if (!pf) {
+		err = ppp_unattached_ioctl(current->nsproxy->net_ns,
+					   pf, file, cmd, arg);
+		goto out;
+	}
 
 	if (cmd == PPPIOCDETACH) {
 		/*
@@ -594,7 +599,6 @@ static long ppp_ioctl(struct file *file,
 		 * this fd and reopening /dev/ppp.
 		 */
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		mutex_lock(&ppp_mutex);
 		if (pf->kind == INTERFACE) {
 			ppp = PF_TO_PPP(pf);
 			rtnl_lock();
@@ -608,15 +612,13 @@ static long ppp_ioctl(struct file *file,
 		} else
 			pr_warn("PPPIOCDETACH file->f_count=%ld\n",
 				atomic_long_read(&file->f_count));
-		mutex_unlock(&ppp_mutex);
-		return err;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	if (pf->kind == CHANNEL) {
 		struct channel *pch;
 		struct ppp_channel *chan;
 
-		mutex_lock(&ppp_mutex);
 		pch = PF_TO_CHANNEL(pf);
 
 		switch (cmd) {
@@ -638,17 +640,16 @@ static long ppp_ioctl(struct file *file,
 				err = chan->ops->ioctl(chan, cmd, arg);
 			up_read(&pch->chan_sem);
 		}
-		mutex_unlock(&ppp_mutex);
-		return err;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
 	if (pf->kind != INTERFACE) {
 		/* can't happen */
 		pr_err("PPP: not interface or channel??\n");
-		return -EINVAL;
+		err = -EINVAL;
+		goto out;
 	}
 
-	mutex_lock(&ppp_mutex);
 	ppp = PF_TO_PPP(pf);
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case PPPIOCSMRU:
@@ -823,7 +824,10 @@ static long ppp_ioctl(struct file *file,
 	default:
 		err = -ENOTTY;
 	}
+
+out:
 	mutex_unlock(&ppp_mutex);
+
 	return err;
 }
 
@@ -836,7 +840,6 @@ static int ppp_unattached_ioctl(struct n
 	struct ppp_net *pn;
 	int __user *p = (int __user *)arg;
 
-	mutex_lock(&ppp_mutex);
 	switch (cmd) {
 	case PPPIOCNEWUNIT:
 		/* Create a new ppp unit */
@@ -886,7 +889,7 @@ static int ppp_unattached_ioctl(struct n
 	default:
 		err = -ENOTTY;
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&ppp_mutex);
+
 	return err;
 }
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from g.nault@alphalink.fr are

queue-4.4/ppp-release-rtnl-mutex-when-interface-creation-fails.patch
queue-4.4/ppp-take-reference-on-channels-netns.patch
queue-4.4/ppp-ensure-file-private_data-can-t-be-overridden.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-04-16 17:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1460826414158120@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=g.nault@alphalink.fr \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.