From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: yang.shi@linaro.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, will.deacon@arm.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "arm64: replace read_lock to rcu lock in call_step_hook" has been added to the 4.5-stable tree
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2016 04:49:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1460893793160235@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
arm64: replace read_lock to rcu lock in call_step_hook
to the 4.5-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
arm64-replace-read_lock-to-rcu-lock-in-call_step_hook.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.5 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From cf0a25436f05753aca5151891aea4fd130556e2a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:49:24 -0800
Subject: arm64: replace read_lock to rcu lock in call_step_hook
From: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
commit cf0a25436f05753aca5151891aea4fd130556e2a upstream.
BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at kernel/locking/rtmutex.c:917
in_atomic(): 1, irqs_disabled(): 128, pid: 383, name: sh
Preemption disabled at:[<ffff800000124c18>] kgdb_cpu_enter+0x158/0x6b8
CPU: 3 PID: 383 Comm: sh Tainted: G W 4.1.13-rt13 #2
Hardware name: Freescale Layerscape 2085a RDB Board (DT)
Call trace:
[<ffff8000000885e8>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x128
[<ffff800000088734>] show_stack+0x24/0x30
[<ffff80000079a7c4>] dump_stack+0x80/0xa0
[<ffff8000000bd324>] ___might_sleep+0x18c/0x1a0
[<ffff8000007a20ac>] __rt_spin_lock+0x2c/0x40
[<ffff8000007a2268>] rt_read_lock+0x40/0x58
[<ffff800000085328>] single_step_handler+0x38/0xd8
[<ffff800000082368>] do_debug_exception+0x58/0xb8
Exception stack(0xffff80834a1e7c80 to 0xffff80834a1e7da0)
7c80: ffffff9c ffffffff 92c23ba0 0000ffff 4a1e7e40 ffff8083 001bfcc4 ffff8000
7ca0: f2000400 00000000 00000000 00000000 4a1e7d80 ffff8083 0049501c ffff8000
7cc0: 00005402 00000000 00aaa210 ffff8000 4a1e7ea0 ffff8083 000833f4 ffff8000
7ce0: ffffff9c ffffffff 92c23ba0 0000ffff 4a1e7ea0 ffff8083 001bfcc0 ffff8000
7d00: 4a0fc400 ffff8083 00005402 00000000 4a1e7d40 ffff8083 00490324 ffff8000
7d20: ffffff9c 00000000 92c23ba0 0000ffff 000a0000 00000000 00000000 00000000
7d40: 00000008 00000000 00080000 00000000 92c23b8b 0000ffff 92c23b8e 0000ffff
7d60: 00000038 00000000 00001cb2 00000000 00000005 00000000 92d7b498 0000ffff
7d80: 01010101 01010101 92be9000 0000ffff 00000000 00000000 00000030 00000000
[<ffff8000000833f4>] el1_dbg+0x18/0x6c
This issue is similar with 62c6c61("arm64: replace read_lock to rcu lock in
call_break_hook"), but comes to single_step_handler.
This also solves kgdbts boot test silent hang issue on 4.4 -rt kernel.
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <yang.shi@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 21 +++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
@@ -186,20 +186,21 @@ static void clear_regs_spsr_ss(struct pt
/* EL1 Single Step Handler hooks */
static LIST_HEAD(step_hook);
-static DEFINE_RWLOCK(step_hook_lock);
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(step_hook_lock);
void register_step_hook(struct step_hook *hook)
{
- write_lock(&step_hook_lock);
- list_add(&hook->node, &step_hook);
- write_unlock(&step_hook_lock);
+ spin_lock(&step_hook_lock);
+ list_add_rcu(&hook->node, &step_hook);
+ spin_unlock(&step_hook_lock);
}
void unregister_step_hook(struct step_hook *hook)
{
- write_lock(&step_hook_lock);
- list_del(&hook->node);
- write_unlock(&step_hook_lock);
+ spin_lock(&step_hook_lock);
+ list_del_rcu(&hook->node);
+ spin_unlock(&step_hook_lock);
+ synchronize_rcu();
}
/*
@@ -213,15 +214,15 @@ static int call_step_hook(struct pt_regs
struct step_hook *hook;
int retval = DBG_HOOK_ERROR;
- read_lock(&step_hook_lock);
+ rcu_read_lock();
- list_for_each_entry(hook, &step_hook, node) {
+ list_for_each_entry_rcu(hook, &step_hook, node) {
retval = hook->fn(regs, esr);
if (retval == DBG_HOOK_HANDLED)
break;
}
- read_unlock(&step_hook_lock);
+ rcu_read_unlock();
return retval;
}
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from yang.shi@linaro.org are
queue-4.5/arm64-replace-read_lock-to-rcu-lock-in-call_step_hook.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-04-17 11:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1460893793160235@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
--cc=yang.shi@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.