From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59DDA605BB; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 22:51:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u3IMo3Jp027667; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:51:10 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id I5MxQ485E7Ya; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:51:10 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u3IMp8En027722 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:51:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1461019868.9308.224.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Khem Raj , Ross Burton Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:51:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembedded-architecture , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: bugzilla.yoctoproject.org policy for bugs against multiple releases X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 22:51:15 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 10:35 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Can we have a possibility to select field like "affected version" > and have it such that multiple versions can be specified That doesn't really allow us to mark version X as merged and version Y as pending review though and as I understand it, that is the real issue atm :/. Cheers, Richard From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 21F0AE00C91; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:51:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A660E00B97 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 15:51:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u3IMo3Jp027667; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:51:10 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id I5MxQ485E7Ya; Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:51:10 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u3IMp8En027722 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:51:09 +0100 Message-ID: <1461019868.9308.224.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Khem Raj , Ross Burton Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 23:51:08 +0100 In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org, openembedded-architecture , Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer Subject: Re: [OE-core] bugzilla.yoctoproject.org policy for bugs against multiple releases X-BeenThere: yocto@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of all things Yocto Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 22:51:18 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 10:35 -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > Can we have a possibility to select field like "affected version" > and have it such that multiple versions can be specified That doesn't really allow us to mark version X as merged and version Y as pending review though and as I understand it, that is the real issue atm :/. Cheers, Richard