From: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, hpa@zytor.com,
x86@kernel.org, bp@alien8.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/rapl: Add missing Haswell model
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 10:58:22 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461175102.8946.140.camel@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160420153816.GD3408@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 17:38 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 08:43:29AM -0700, Srinivas Pandruvada wrote:
> >
> > Added one missing Haswell model.
> Indeed, but when I compare with the table in events/intel/core.c I
> find
> we also miss one Broadwell (86) model.
>
> Would the below be correct for that?
Yes.
Thanks,
Srinivas
>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c | 13 +++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
> b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
> index 7c56b985c9f6..f9129a85928a 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/rapl.c
> @@ -739,16 +739,21 @@ static const struct intel_rapl_init_fun
> knl_rapl_init __initconst = {
>
> static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_cpu_match[] __initconst = {
> X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(42, snb_rapl_init), /* Sandy
> Bridge */
> + X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(45, snbep_rapl_init), /* Sandy
> Bridge-EP */
> +
> X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(58, snb_rapl_init), /* Ivy
> Bridge */
> - X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(63, hsx_rapl_init), /* Haswell-
> Server */
> - X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(79, hsx_rapl_init), /*
> Broadwell-Server */
> + X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(62, snbep_rapl_init), /* IvyTown
> */
> +
> X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(60, hsw_rapl_init), /* Haswell
> */
> + X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(63, hsx_rapl_init), /* Haswell-
> Server */
> X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(69, hsw_rapl_init), /* Haswell-
> Celeron */
> X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(70, hsw_rapl_init), /* Haswell
> GTe3 */
> +
> X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(61, hsw_rapl_init), /* Broadwell
> */
> X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(71, hsw_rapl_init), /*
> Broadwell-H */
> - X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(45, snbep_rapl_init), /* Sandy
> Bridge-EP */
> - X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(62, snbep_rapl_init), /* IvyTown
> */
> + X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(79, hsx_rapl_init), /*
> Broadwell-Server */
> + X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(86, hsx_rapl_init), /* Broadwell
> Xeon D */
> +
> X86_RAPL_MODEL_MATCH(87, knl_rapl_init), /* Knights
> Landing */
> {},
> };
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-20 17:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-17 15:43 [PATCH] perf/x86/intel/rapl: Add missing Haswell model Srinivas Pandruvada
2016-04-20 15:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-20 17:58 ` Srinivas Pandruvada [this message]
2016-04-23 12:53 ` [tip:perf/core] " tip-bot for Srinivas Pandruvada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1461175102.8946.140.camel@linux.intel.com \
--to=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.