All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mingo@redhat.com" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	terry.rudd@hpe.com, "Long, Wai Man" <waiman.long@hpe.com>,
	"boqun.feng@gmail.com" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	"dave@stgolabs.net" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	jason.low2@hp.com
Subject: Re: [RFC] arm64: Implement WFE based spin wait for MCS spinlocks
Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 12:36:51 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461181011.3113.75.camel@j-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160420103059.GX3408@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Wed, 2016-04-20 at 12:30 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:13:38AM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> > Use WFE to avoid most spinning with MCS spinlocks. This is implemented
> > with the new cmpwait() mechanism for comparing and waiting for the MCS
> > locked value to change using LDXR + WFE.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
> > ---
> >  arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> > 
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..d295d9d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/mcs_spinlock.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
> > +#ifndef __ASM_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
> > +#define __ASM_MCS_SPINLOCK_H
> > +
> > +#define arch_mcs_spin_lock_contended(l)					\
> > +do {									\
> > +	int locked_val;							\
> > +	for (;;) {							\
> > +		locked_val = READ_ONCE(*l);				\
> > +		if (locked_val)						\
> > +			break;						\
> > +		cmpwait(l, locked_val);					\
> > +	}								\
> > +	smp_rmb();							\
> > +} while (0)
> 
> If you make the generic version use smp_cond_load_acquire() this isn't
> needed.

Yup, in the email thread about modifying the generic version to use
smp_cond_load_acquire(), I mentioned that overriding it in arch/arm64
would not be needed anymore.

Will made a suggestion about overriding it on arm64, but it turns out he
was just referring to avoiding the immediate dependency on
smp_cond_load_acquire().

Thanks,
Jason

      reply	other threads:[~2016-04-20 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-14  7:13 [RFC] arm64: Implement WFE based spin wait for MCS spinlocks Jason Low
2016-04-20 10:30 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-04-20 19:36   ` Jason Low [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1461181011.3113.75.camel@j-VirtualBox \
    --to=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=terry.rudd@hpe.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=waiman.long@hpe.com \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.