From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Krishna Chaitanya <chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-wireless <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
Johannes Berg <johannes@sipsolutions.net>
Subject: Re: Debug prints mac80211 drivers
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2016 01:05:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461398719.2726.22.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CABPxzYJmKpw+Z0xm0+-mVUx5-bLrbKKi3V3UGhKoAT4Uf68r2g@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 13:11 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 3:48 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 2016-04-23 at 02:32 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
> > >
> > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 2016-04-22 at 17:51 +0530, Krishna Chaitanya wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > What is the recommended method for adding
> > > > > debug prints in mac80211 based drivers.
> > > > >
> > > > > 1) -DDEBUG + pr_debug ==> used by mac80211, brcm80211
> > > > > 2) -DDEBUG + dev_dbg ==> zd1201
> > > > > 3) dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) ==> used by iwlwifi
> > > > > 4) printk(KERN_DEBUG) ==> Just to complete the list.
> > > > wiphy_dbg -> netif_dbg -> netdev_dbg -> dev_dbg -> pr_debug
> > > Ok, thats what checpatch --strict throws. but still different
> > > vendors
> > > follow
> > > different standards, so wanted to check if we should go strictly
> > > with
> > > checkpatch (or) is there any rationale behind choose each of the
> > > variant.
> > Generally the variants are used to produce sufficient
> > logging information to identify the appropriate device.
> >
> > Most all debugging printks shouldn't be emitted unless
> > actually debugging.
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > and CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG, no -DDEBUG required
> > > Yes, i understand. Till now we had this enabled, so pr_debug
> > > works just fine, but now it is disabled hence the question.
> > >
> > > Also there are pros and cons to having control using dyndbg,
> > > user can disable dyndbg, there be missing imp
> > imp?
> Sorry, important.
> >
> > >
> > > debugs, in this case
> > > having module level (-DDEBUG) helps but if we want entire system
> > > to run in non-debug mode, disabling dyndbg helps.
> > Confused:
> >
> > dynamic debug printks aren't emitted by default
> > unless DEBUG is also defined or specifically
> > enabled by the user.
> I don't think so, enabling dynamic debug should suffice.
>
> 280 #if defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)
> 281 /* dynamic_pr_debug() uses pr_fmt() internally so we don't need it
> here */
> 282 #define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \
> 283 dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
> 284 #elif defined(DEBUG)
> 285 #define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \
> 286 printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> 287 #else
> 288 #define pr_debug(fmt, ...) \
> 289 no_printk(KERN_DEBUG pr_fmt(fmt), ##__VA_ARGS__)
> 290 #endif
>
Nope.
Look at dynamic_debug.h
#if defined DEBUG
#define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT
#else
#define _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT 0
#endif
and
.flags = _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT,
and
#define DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(name, fmt) \
static struct _ddebug __aligned(8) \
__attribute__((section("__verbose"))) name = { \
.modname = KBUILD_MODNAME, \
.function = __func__, \
.filename = __FILE__, \
.format = (fmt), \
.lineno = __LINE__, \
.flags = _DPRINTK_FLAGS_DEFAULT, \
}
and
#define dynamic_pr_debug(fmt, ...) \
do { \
DEFINE_DYNAMIC_DEBUG_METADATA(descriptor, fmt); \
if (unlikely(descriptor.flags & _DPRINTK_FLAGS_PRINT)) \
__dynamic_pr_debug(&descriptor, pr_fmt(fmt), \
##__VA_ARGS__); \
} while (0)
So by default, it's not enabled to be output
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-23 8:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-22 12:21 Debug prints mac80211 drivers Krishna Chaitanya
2016-04-22 19:29 ` Joe Perches
2016-04-22 21:02 ` Krishna Chaitanya
2016-04-22 22:18 ` Joe Perches
2016-04-23 7:41 ` Krishna Chaitanya
2016-04-23 8:05 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2016-04-23 8:23 ` Krishna Chaitanya
2016-04-23 8:41 ` Krishna Chaitanya
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1461398719.2726.22.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=chaitanya.mgit@gmail.com \
--cc=johannes@sipsolutions.net \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.