From: mlin@kernel.org (Ming Lin)
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] nvme: fix nvme_ns_remove() deadlock
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:20:19 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461619219-18144-3-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1461619219-18144-1-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org>
From: Ming Lin <ming.l@ssi.samsung.com>
On receipt of a namespace attribute changed AER, we acquire the
namespace mutex lock before proceeding to scan and validate the
namespace list. In case of namespace detach/delete command,
nvme_ns_remove function deadlocks trying to acquire the already held
lock.
All callers, except nvme_remove_namespaces(), of nvme_ns_remove()
already held namespaces_mutex. So we can simply fix the deadlock by
not acquiring the mutex in nvme_ns_remove() and acquiring it in
nvme_remove_namespaces().
Reported-by: Sunad Bhandary S <sunad.s at samsung.com>
Signed-off-by: Ming Lin <ming.l at ssi.samsung.com>
---
drivers/nvme/host/core.c | 6 ++++--
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
index 914d336..4fff373 100644
--- a/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
+++ b/drivers/nvme/host/core.c
@@ -1403,6 +1403,8 @@ static void nvme_alloc_ns(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl, unsigned nsid)
static void nvme_ns_remove(struct nvme_ns *ns)
{
+ lockdep_assert_held(&ns->ctrl->namespaces_mutex);
+
if (test_and_set_bit(NVME_NS_REMOVING, &ns->flags))
return;
@@ -1415,9 +1417,7 @@ static void nvme_ns_remove(struct nvme_ns *ns)
blk_mq_abort_requeue_list(ns->queue);
blk_cleanup_queue(ns->queue);
}
- mutex_lock(&ns->ctrl->namespaces_mutex);
list_del_init(&ns->list);
- mutex_unlock(&ns->ctrl->namespaces_mutex);
synchronize_rcu();
nvme_put_ns(ns);
}
@@ -1513,8 +1513,10 @@ void nvme_remove_namespaces(struct nvme_ctrl *ctrl)
{
struct nvme_ns *ns, *next;
+ mutex_lock(&ctrl->namespaces_mutex);
list_for_each_entry_safe(ns, next, &ctrl->namespaces, list)
nvme_ns_remove(ns);
+ mutex_unlock(&ctrl->namespaces_mutex);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(nvme_remove_namespaces);
--
1.9.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 21:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-25 21:20 [PATCH v2 0/2] nvme_ns_remove() deadlock fix Ming Lin
2016-04-25 21:20 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] nvme: switch to RCU freeing the namespace Ming Lin
2016-04-26 8:41 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-26 21:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-05-15 6:58 ` Ming Lin
2016-05-16 22:38 ` Ming Lin
2016-05-17 15:05 ` Keith Busch
2016-05-17 15:23 ` Keith Busch
2016-05-17 15:30 ` Keith Busch
2016-05-17 20:48 ` Ming Lin
2016-05-17 21:07 ` Keith Busch
2016-05-17 21:09 ` Ming Lin
2016-05-17 21:25 ` Keith Busch
2016-05-19 5:52 ` Ming Lin
2016-05-19 20:48 ` Keith Busch
2016-05-20 14:16 ` Keith Busch
2016-05-20 17:57 ` Ming Lin
2016-05-23 10:38 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-05-23 15:22 ` Keith Busch
2016-04-25 21:20 ` Ming Lin [this message]
2016-04-26 8:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] nvme: fix nvme_ns_remove() deadlock Christoph Hellwig
2016-04-26 21:17 ` Sagi Grimberg
2016-04-26 15:39 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] nvme_ns_remove() deadlock fix Keith Busch
2016-05-02 15:16 ` Jens Axboe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1461619219-18144-3-git-send-email-mlin@kernel.org \
--to=mlin@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.