All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tristan Van Berkom <tristan.vanberkom@codethink.co.uk>
To: Khem Raj <raj.khem@gmail.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] Backporting binutils bug fix to the 2.25 branch
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2016 12:31:22 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461688282.4356.31.camel@codethink.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C2525670-C153-4CFC-B911-0567821B899B@gmail.com>

On Mon, 2016-04-25 at 13:55 -0700, Khem Raj wrote:
> > On Apr 25, 2016, at 1:44 PM, Tristan Van Berkom <tristan.vanberkom@
> > codethink.co.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > We fail to build webkit on aarch64 due to this binutils bug:
> > 
> >   https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19353
> > 
> > Applying patch which fixes this, stripped out changelog entry
> > from patch to make it apply without error.
> 
> 
> which branch are you proposing this for?
> we use 2.26 on master

We are using the jethro branch, sorry for leaving out that detail.

Cheers,
    -Tristan

> 
> > ---
> > meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.25.1.inc |   1 +
> > ...plying-TLSDESC-relocs-without-TLS-segment.patch | 166
> > +++++++++++++++++++++
> > 2 files changed, 167 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/fix-
> > internal-error-when-applying-TLSDESC-relocs-without-TLS-
> > segment.patch
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.25.1.inc
> > b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.25.1.inc
> > index f3817fa..c7db9e0 100644
> > --- a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.25.1.inc
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils-2.25.1.inc
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@ SRC_URI = "\
> >      file://0015-Fix-dynamic-list-so-that-symbols-not-in-the-list-
> > are.patch \
> >      file://binutils-octeon3.patch \
> >      file://add-thunderx-support-for-gas.patch \
> > +     file://fix-internal-error-when-applying-TLSDESC-relocs-
> > without-TLS-segment.patch \
> >      "
> > S  = "${WORKDIR}/git"
> > 
> > diff --git a/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/fix-internal-
> > error-when-applying-TLSDESC-relocs-without-TLS-segment.patch
> > b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/fix-internal-error-when-
> > applying-TLSDESC-relocs-without-TLS-segment.patch
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..df9d54c
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/meta/recipes-devtools/binutils/binutils/fix-internal-error-
> > when-applying-TLSDESC-relocs-without-TLS-segment.patch
> > @@ -0,0 +1,166 @@
> > +From d21f123b0ead1806416cf0dafae12bec4cca8920 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00
> > 2001
> > +From: Cary Coutant <ccoutant@gmail.com>
> > +Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 23:57:44 -0800
> > +Subject: [PATCH] Fix internal error when applying TLSDESC
> > relocations with no TLS segment.
> > +
> > +gold/
> > +	PR gold/19353
> > +	* aarch64.cc (Target_aarch64::relocate_tls): Don't insist
> > that
> > +	we have a TLS segment for GD-to-IE optimization.
> > +	* i386.cc (Target_i386::tls_gd_to_ie): Remove tls_segment
> > parameter.
> > +	Adjust all calls.
> > +	(Target_i386::tls_desc_gd_to_ie): Likewise.
> > +	(Target_i386::relocate_tls): Don't insist that we have a
> > TLS segment
> > +	for TLSDESC GD-to-IE optimizations.
> > +	* x86_64.cc (Target_x86_64::tls_gd_to_ie): Remove
> > tls_segment parameter.
> > +	Adjust all calls.
> > +	(Target_x86_64::tls_desc_gd_to_ie): Likewise.
> > +	(Target_x86_64::relocate_tls): Don't insist that we have a
> > TLS segment
> > +	for TLSDESC GD-to-IE optimizations.
> > +---
> > + gold/aarch64.cc |    6 ------
> > + gold/i386.cc    |   14 ++------------
> > + gold/x86_64.cc  |   14 ++------------
> > + 4 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
> > +
> > +diff --git a/gold/aarch64.cc b/gold/aarch64.cc
> > +index 20f2f4f..5ad061b 100644
> > +--- a/gold/aarch64.cc
> > ++++ b/gold/aarch64.cc
> > +@@ -7422,12 +7422,6 @@ Target_aarch64<size,
> > big_endian>::Relocate::relocate_tls(
> > + 	      }
> > + 	    if (tlsopt == tls::TLSOPT_TO_IE)
> > + 	      {
> > +-		if (tls_segment == NULL)
> > +-		  {
> > +-		    gold_assert(parameters->errors()-
> > >error_count() > 0
> > +-				||
> > issue_undefined_symbol_error(gsym));
> > +-		    return aarch64_reloc_funcs::STATUS_BAD_RELOC;
> > +-		  }
> > + 		return tls_desc_gd_to_ie(relinfo, target, rela,
> > r_type,
> > + 					 view, psymval,
> > got_entry_address,
> > + 					 address);
> > +diff --git a/gold/i386.cc b/gold/i386.cc
> > +index 82886d4..a7168a8 100644
> > +--- a/gold/i386.cc
> > ++++ b/gold/i386.cc
> > +@@ -668,7 +668,6 @@ class Target_i386 : public Sized_target<32,
> > false>
> > +     // Do a TLS General-Dynamic to Initial-Exec transition.
> > +     inline void
> > +     tls_gd_to_ie(const Relocate_info<32, false>*, size_t relnum,
> > +-		 Output_segment* tls_segment,
> > + 		 const elfcpp::Rel<32, false>&, unsigned int
> > r_type,
> > + 		 elfcpp::Elf_types<32>::Elf_Addr value,
> > + 		 unsigned char* view,
> > +@@ -687,7 +686,6 @@ class Target_i386 : public Sized_target<32,
> > false>
> > +     // transition.
> > +     inline void
> > +     tls_desc_gd_to_ie(const Relocate_info<32, false>*, size_t
> > relnum,
> > +-		      Output_segment* tls_segment,
> > + 		      const elfcpp::Rel<32, false>&, unsigned int
> > r_type,
> > + 		      elfcpp::Elf_types<32>::Elf_Addr value,
> > + 		      unsigned char* view,
> > +@@ -3054,7 +3052,7 @@ Target_i386::Relocate::relocate_tls(const
> > Relocate_info<32, false>* relinfo,
> > + 	    }
> > + 	  if (optimized_type == tls::TLSOPT_TO_IE)
> > + 	    {
> > +-	      this->tls_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum, tls_segment,
> > rel, r_type,
> > ++	      this->tls_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum, rel, r_type,
> > + 				 got_offset, view, view_size);
> > + 	      break;
> > + 	    }
> > +@@ -3116,13 +3114,7 @@ Target_i386::Relocate::relocate_tls(const
> > Relocate_info<32, false>* relinfo,
> > + 	    }
> > + 	  if (optimized_type == tls::TLSOPT_TO_IE)
> > + 	    {
> > +-	      if (tls_segment == NULL)
> > +-		{
> > +-		  gold_assert(parameters->errors()->error_count() 
> > > 0
> > +-			      ||
> > issue_undefined_symbol_error(gsym));
> > +-		  return;
> > +-		}
> > +-	      this->tls_desc_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum,
> > tls_segment, rel, r_type,
> > ++	      this->tls_desc_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum, rel,
> > r_type,
> > + 				      got_offset, view,
> > view_size);
> > + 	      break;
> > + 	    }
> > +@@ -3354,7 +3346,6 @@ Target_i386::Relocate::tls_gd_to_le(const
> > Relocate_info<32, false>* relinfo,
> > + inline void
> > + Target_i386::Relocate::tls_gd_to_ie(const Relocate_info<32,
> > false>* relinfo,
> > + 				    size_t relnum,
> > +-				    Output_segment*,
> > + 				    const elfcpp::Rel<32, false>&
> > rel,
> > + 				    unsigned int,
> > + 				    elfcpp::Elf_types<32>::Elf_Ad
> > dr value,
> > +@@ -3449,7 +3440,6 @@ inline void
> > + Target_i386::Relocate::tls_desc_gd_to_ie(
> > +     const Relocate_info<32, false>* relinfo,
> > +     size_t relnum,
> > +-    Output_segment*,
> > +     const elfcpp::Rel<32, false>& rel,
> > +     unsigned int r_type,
> > +     elfcpp::Elf_types<32>::Elf_Addr value,
> > +diff --git a/gold/x86_64.cc b/gold/x86_64.cc
> > +index 3cfc064..4ad5afc 100644
> > +--- a/gold/x86_64.cc
> > ++++ b/gold/x86_64.cc
> > +@@ -816,7 +816,6 @@ class Target_x86_64 : public
> > Sized_target<size, false>
> > +     // Do a TLS General-Dynamic to Initial-Exec transition.
> > +     inline void
> > +     tls_gd_to_ie(const Relocate_info<size, false>*, size_t
> > relnum,
> > +-		 Output_segment* tls_segment,
> > + 		 const elfcpp::Rela<size, false>&, unsigned int
> > r_type,
> > + 		 typename elfcpp::Elf_types<size>::Elf_Addr
> > value,
> > + 		 unsigned char* view,
> > +@@ -835,7 +834,6 @@ class Target_x86_64 : public
> > Sized_target<size, false>
> > +     // Do a TLSDESC-style General-Dynamic to Initial-Exec
> > transition.
> > +     inline void
> > +     tls_desc_gd_to_ie(const Relocate_info<size, false>*, size_t
> > relnum,
> > +-		      Output_segment* tls_segment,
> > + 		      const elfcpp::Rela<size, false>&, unsigned
> > int r_type,
> > + 		      typename elfcpp::Elf_types<size>::Elf_Addr
> > value,
> > + 		      unsigned char* view,
> > +@@ -3733,7 +3731,7 @@ Target_x86_64<size>::Relocate::relocate_tls(
> > + 	  if (optimized_type == tls::TLSOPT_TO_IE)
> > + 	    {
> > + 	      value = target->got_plt_section()->address() +
> > got_offset;
> > +-	      this->tls_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum, tls_segment,
> > rela, r_type,
> > ++	      this->tls_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum, rela, r_type,
> > + 				 value, view, address,
> > view_size);
> > + 	      break;
> > + 	    }
> > +@@ -3800,14 +3798,8 @@
> > Target_x86_64<size>::Relocate::relocate_tls(
> > + 	    }
> > + 	  if (optimized_type == tls::TLSOPT_TO_IE)
> > + 	    {
> > +-	      if (tls_segment == NULL)
> > +-		{
> > +-		  gold_assert(parameters->errors()->error_count() 
> > > 0
> > +-			      ||
> > issue_undefined_symbol_error(gsym));
> > +-		  return;
> > +-		}
> > + 	      value = target->got_plt_section()->address() +
> > got_offset;
> > +-	      this->tls_desc_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum,
> > tls_segment,
> > ++	      this->tls_desc_gd_to_ie(relinfo, relnum,
> > + 				      rela, r_type, value, view,
> > address,
> > + 				      view_size);
> > + 	      break;
> > +@@ -3973,7 +3965,6 @@ inline void
> > + Target_x86_64<size>::Relocate::tls_gd_to_ie(
> > +     const Relocate_info<size, false>* relinfo,
> > +     size_t relnum,
> > +-    Output_segment*,
> > +     const elfcpp::Rela<size, false>& rela,
> > +     unsigned int,
> > +     typename elfcpp::Elf_types<size>::Elf_Addr value,
> > +@@ -4085,7 +4076,6 @@ inline void
> > + Target_x86_64<size>::Relocate::tls_desc_gd_to_ie(
> > +     const Relocate_info<size, false>* relinfo,
> > +     size_t relnum,
> > +-    Output_segment*,
> > +     const elfcpp::Rela<size, false>& rela,
> > +     unsigned int r_type,
> > +     typename elfcpp::Elf_types<size>::Elf_Addr value,
> > +--
> > +1.7.1
> > +
> > --
> > 2.8.0.rc3
> > 
> > --
> > _______________________________________________
> > Openembedded-core mailing list
> > Openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
> > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-core
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-26 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-25 20:44 [PATCH 1/4] gcc-cross-initial: Split all-gcc and configure-target-libgcc Tristan Van Berkom
2016-04-25 20:44 ` [PATCH 3/4] Backporting binutils bug fix to the 2.25 branch Tristan Van Berkom
2016-04-25 20:55   ` Khem Raj
2016-04-26 16:31     ` Tristan Van Berkom [this message]
2016-04-26 16:34       ` Khem Raj
2016-04-27 21:49         ` Tristan Van Berkom
2016-04-26  8:41 ` [PATCH 1/4] gcc-cross-initial: Split all-gcc and configure-target-libgcc Richard Purdie
2016-04-26 16:52   ` Khem Raj
2016-04-26 21:19   ` Tristan Van Berkom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1461688282.4356.31.camel@codethink.co.uk \
    --to=tristan.vanberkom@codethink.co.uk \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=raj.khem@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.