From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: imre.deak@intel.com, chris@chris-wilson.co.uk,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, jani.nikula@intel.com,
ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "drm/i915: Fix system resume if PCI device remained enabled" has been added to the 4.5-stable tree
Date: Sun, 08 May 2016 19:04:44 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14627270846739@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm/i915: Fix system resume if PCI device remained enabled
to the 4.5-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
drm-i915-fix-system-resume-if-pci-device-remained-enabled.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.5 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From dab9a2663f4e688106c041f7cd2797a721382f0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 14:45:54 +0300
Subject: drm/i915: Fix system resume if PCI device remained enabled
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
commit dab9a2663f4e688106c041f7cd2797a721382f0a upstream.
During system resume we depended on pci_enable_device() also putting the
device into PCI D0 state. This won't work if the PCI device was already
enabled but still in D3 state. This is because pci_enable_device() is
refcounted and will not change the HW state if called with a non-zero
refcount. Leaving the device in D3 will make all subsequent device
accesses fail.
This didn't cause a problem most of the time, since we resumed with an
enable refcount of 0. But it fails at least after module reload because
after that we also happen to leak a PCI device enable reference: During
probing we call drm_get_pci_dev() which will enable the PCI device, but
during device removal drm_put_dev() won't disable it. This is a bug of
its own in DRM core, but without much harm as it only leaves the PCI
device enabled. Fixing it is also a bit more involved, due to DRM
mid-layering and because it affects non-i915 drivers too. The fix in
this patch is valid regardless of the problem in DRM core.
v2:
- Add a code comment about the relation of this fix to the freeze/thaw
vs. the suspend/resume phases. (Ville)
- Add a code comment about the inconsistent ordering of set power state
and device enable calls. (Chris)
CC: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1460979954-14503-1-git-send-email-imre.deak@intel.com
(cherry picked from commit 44410cd0bfb26bde9288da34c190cc9267d42a20)
Signed-off-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_drv.c
@@ -797,7 +797,7 @@ static int i915_drm_resume(struct drm_de
static int i915_drm_resume_early(struct drm_device *dev)
{
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
- int ret = 0;
+ int ret;
/*
* We have a resume ordering issue with the snd-hda driver also
@@ -808,6 +808,36 @@ static int i915_drm_resume_early(struct
* FIXME: This should be solved with a special hdmi sink device or
* similar so that power domains can be employed.
*/
+
+ /*
+ * Note that we need to set the power state explicitly, since we
+ * powered off the device during freeze and the PCI core won't power
+ * it back up for us during thaw. Powering off the device during
+ * freeze is not a hard requirement though, and during the
+ * suspend/resume phases the PCI core makes sure we get here with the
+ * device powered on. So in case we change our freeze logic and keep
+ * the device powered we can also remove the following set power state
+ * call.
+ */
+ ret = pci_set_power_state(dev->pdev, PCI_D0);
+ if (ret) {
+ DRM_ERROR("failed to set PCI D0 power state (%d)\n", ret);
+ goto out;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Note that pci_enable_device() first enables any parent bridge
+ * device and only then sets the power state for this device. The
+ * bridge enabling is a nop though, since bridge devices are resumed
+ * first. The order of enabling power and enabling the device is
+ * imposed by the PCI core as described above, so here we preserve the
+ * same order for the freeze/thaw phases.
+ *
+ * TODO: eventually we should remove pci_disable_device() /
+ * pci_enable_enable_device() from suspend/resume. Due to how they
+ * depend on the device enable refcount we can't anyway depend on them
+ * disabling/enabling the device.
+ */
if (pci_enable_device(dev->pdev)) {
ret = -EIO;
goto out;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from imre.deak@intel.com are
queue-4.5/drm-i915-ddi-fix-edp-vdd-handling-during-booting-and-suspend-resume.patch
queue-4.5/drm-i915-fix-system-resume-if-pci-device-remained-enabled.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-05-08 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14627270846739@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=imre.deak@intel.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.