All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
To: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
	Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>,
	peter@hurleysoftware.com, jason.low2@hpe.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Optimize write lock slowpath
Date: Wed, 11 May 2016 11:49:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1462992562.2488.26.camel@j-VirtualBox> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160511183328.GA10711@linux-uzut.site>

On Wed, 2016-05-11 at 11:33 -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Wed, 11 May 2016, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> 
> >On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 12:16:37PM -0700, Jason Low wrote:
> >> When acquiring the rwsem write lock in the slowpath, we first try
> >> to set count to RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS. When that is successful,
> >> we then atomically add the RWSEM_WAITING_BIAS in cases where
> >> there are other tasks on the wait list. This causes write lock
> >> operations to often issue multiple atomic operations.
> >>
> >> We can instead make the list_is_singular() check first, and then
> >> set the count accordingly, so that we issue at most 1 atomic
> >> operation when acquiring the write lock and reduce unnecessary
> >> cacheline contention.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jason Low <jason.low2@hp.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
> 
> (one nit: the patch title could be more informative to what
> optimization we are talking about here... ie: reduce atomic ops
> in writer slowpath' or something.)

Yeah, the "optimize write lock slowpath" subject is a bit generic. I'll
make the title more specific in the next version.

Thanks,
Jason

      reply	other threads:[~2016-05-11 18:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-09 19:16 [PATCH] locking/rwsem: Optimize write lock slowpath Jason Low
2016-05-10  2:25 ` Waiman Long
2016-05-11 11:49 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11 18:26   ` Jason Low
2016-05-11 18:38     ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-11 18:33   ` Davidlohr Bueso
2016-05-11 18:49     ` Jason Low [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1462992562.2488.26.camel@j-VirtualBox \
    --to=jason.low2@hp.com \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=jason.low2@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peter@hurleysoftware.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.