From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38115) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b17xj-0002rI-De for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 03:56:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b17xg-0007QN-5w for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 03:56:43 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:42538) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b17xf-0007QE-WB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 13 May 2016 03:56:40 -0400 Message-ID: <1463126197.14138.34.camel@redhat.com> From: Gerd Hoffmann Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:56:37 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1463061427.14756.5.camel@redhat.com> References: <1462859517-30207-1-git-send-email-kraxel@redhat.com> <1463061427.14756.5.camel@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/12] ui patch queue List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers Hi, > > This was on ppc64be Linux, though I'm guessing that's just because > > it's the only system that happens not to define CONFIG_VTE. >=20 > mingw builds don't have vte too, so I'm wondering now how that one > managed to escape my attention ... Ah, because only linux builds default to -Werror. Maybe we should change that? mingw builds without warnings these days for me (which wasn't the case a while ago, which in turn is probably the reason for the selective -Werror). cheers, Gerd