From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Patrick Ohly <patrick.ohly@intel.com>,
bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] runqueue.py: always emit bb.event.DepTreeGenerated
Date: Sun, 15 May 2016 09:15:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1463300142.9746.154.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463065210-3823-1-git-send-email-patrick.ohly@intel.com>
On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 17:00 +0200, Patrick Ohly wrote:
> The data included in the event is useful for implementing a pre-build
> check that warns about unexpected components, for example because of
> an incorrect configuration or changed dependencies.
>
> Such a check can be done in a .bbclass that gets inherited
> globally. But in contrast to a UI, such a class cannot request that
> the event shall be emitted, and thus the event has to be emitted
> whether there is a consumer or not.
>
> This was done conditionally earlier out of concerns about the
> performance impact. But now events are handled more efficiently, so
> that concern no longer seems valid: in some simple testing
> (admittedly
> on a fast build workstation), the two lines (generating the data and
> emitting the event with it) only took about 0.05 seconds (measured
> with timeit). That was for a build with roughly 500 recipes (from
> pn-buildlist aka depgraph['pn']), triggered via the command line.
> That
> was even with a consumer of the data active and doing some work, so
> it
> should be even faster when there is no consumer.
I've taken this since now we have event filtering, we don't take the
IPC/RPC cost for data that the receiver doesn't care about. I added a
follow up patch which removes the feature entirely since this code
block was the only reason for it.
Cheers,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-15 8:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-12 15:00 [PATCH] runqueue.py: always emit bb.event.DepTreeGenerated Patrick Ohly
2016-05-15 8:15 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-05-12 13:58 Patrick Ohly
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1463300142.9746.154.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=patrick.ohly@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.