From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeff Kirsher Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 12:56:56 -0700 Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] [next PATCH S37 10/15] i40e: Removing unnecessary code which caused supported link mode bug In-Reply-To: <475EF86EA1AC844AA3BA8EE1F912AD6903CCA105@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> References: <1463419605-30746-1-git-send-email-bimmy.pujari@intel.com> <1463419605-30746-11-git-send-email-bimmy.pujari@intel.com> <475EF86EA1AC844AA3BA8EE1F912AD6903CCA105@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> Message-ID: <1463428616.2609.2.camel@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org List-ID: On Mon, 2016-05-16 at 18:26 +0000, Dayanand, Avinash wrote: > ACK, looks good..? Do not top-post! ?Patchwork thought you were submitting a new patch, instead of responding to a patch that was already in the queue. > -----Original Message----- > From: Pujari, Bimmy? > Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 10:27 AM > To: intel-wired-lan at lists.osuosl.org > Cc: Dayanand, Avinash > Subject: [next PATCH S37 10/15] i40e: Removing unnecessary code which > caused supported link mode bug > > From: Avinash Dayanand > > Removing this code which wasn't allowing 100BaseT to show up in the > supported link modes for 10GBaseT PHYs. > > Signed-off-by: Avinash Dayanand > Change-ID: Iada2eafa7ef6b4bac9a2a1380ff533ae5de51e1d > --- > Testing Hints: Use 'ethtool ethx' check if 100BaseT is listed as one of > the supported link modes. > > ?drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_ethtool.c | 3 +-- > ?1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part URL: