From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: openembedded-architecture
<openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org>,
bitbake-devel <bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: Python 3 for Bitbake
Date: Sun, 22 May 2016 08:58:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1463903937.9570.12.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1462826340.21831.151.camel@linuxfoundation.org>
Where are we at?
The python3 branches in bitbake, OE-Core and poky are looking fairly
good from a build perspective. The run overnight on the autobuilder had
the following issues:
ppc specific sanity test failure:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-ppc/builds/7
99
https:
//autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-ppc-lsb/builds/770
weird intermittent multilib failure:
https:/
/autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-multilib/builds/795
4 test failures in oe-selftest:
https://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org/main/builders/nightly-oe-selftest/
builds/517
which given the scope of the changes isn't so bad.
I have merged some of the pieces which are 2.7 safe into master. We've
had some issues with buildtools-tarball and the python3 it contains but
I think we're nearly there in resolving that. I don't believe toaster i
quite there yet either but getting close.
The question is therefore how much more work to do before those
branches are ready for merging? They do need a little more cosmetic
cleanup but I think things are very close.
I would like to get them merged sooner than later since they are quite
a nightmare to maintain.
Cheers,
Richard
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-22 7:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-04 8:56 Python 3 for Bitbake Richard Purdie
2016-05-04 21:19 ` Christopher Larson
2016-05-04 21:29 ` [Openembedded-architecture] " Mark Hatle
2016-05-04 21:34 ` Burton, Ross
2016-05-05 5:10 ` Tim Orling
2016-05-06 8:40 ` Burton, Ross
2016-05-05 12:13 ` Philip Balister
2016-05-05 15:13 ` Mark Hatle
2016-05-05 15:18 ` Christopher Larson
2016-05-05 15:50 ` Otavio Salvador
2016-05-05 17:29 ` Jan-Simon Möller
2016-05-05 17:47 ` Otavio Salvador
2016-05-05 17:50 ` akuster
2016-05-09 20:39 ` Richard Purdie
2016-05-22 7:58 ` Richard Purdie [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1463903937.9570.12.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
--to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=openembedded-architecture@lists.openembedded.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.