From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: rostedt@goodmis.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "ring-buffer: Prevent overflow of size in ring_buffer_resize()" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Date: Sun, 29 May 2016 14:51:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14645587185539@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ring-buffer: Prevent overflow of size in ring_buffer_resize()
to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ring-buffer-prevent-overflow-of-size-in-ring_buffer_resize.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 59643d1535eb220668692a5359de22545af579f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2016 09:34:12 -0400
Subject: ring-buffer: Prevent overflow of size in ring_buffer_resize()
From: Steven Rostedt (Red Hat) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
commit 59643d1535eb220668692a5359de22545af579f6 upstream.
If the size passed to ring_buffer_resize() is greater than MAX_LONG - BUF_PAGE_SIZE
then the DIV_ROUND_UP() will return zero.
Here's the details:
# echo 18014398509481980 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb
tracing_entries_write() processes this and converts kb to bytes.
18014398509481980 << 10 = 18446744073709547520
and this is passed to ring_buffer_resize() as unsigned long size.
size = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE);
Where DIV_ROUND_UP(a, b) is (a + b - 1)/b
BUF_PAGE_SIZE is 4080 and here
18446744073709547520 + 4080 - 1 = 18446744073709551599
where 18446744073709551599 is still smaller than 2^64
2^64 - 18446744073709551599 = 17
But now 18446744073709551599 / 4080 = 4521260802379792
and size = size * 4080 = 18446744073709551360
This is checked to make sure its still greater than 2 * 4080,
which it is.
Then we convert to the number of buffer pages needed.
nr_page = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE)
but this time size is 18446744073709551360 and
2^64 - (18446744073709551360 + 4080 - 1) = -3823
Thus it overflows and the resulting number is less than 4080, which makes
3823 / 4080 = 0
an nr_pages is set to this. As we already checked against the minimum that
nr_pages may be, this causes the logic to fail as well, and we crash the
kernel.
There's no reason to have the two DIV_ROUND_UP() (that's just result of
historical code changes), clean up the code and fix this bug.
Fixes: 83f40318dab00 ("ring-buffer: Make removal of ring buffer pages atomic")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -1645,14 +1645,13 @@ int ring_buffer_resize(struct ring_buffe
!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu_id, buffer->cpumask))
return size;
- size = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE);
- size *= BUF_PAGE_SIZE;
+ nr_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE);
/* we need a minimum of two pages */
- if (size < BUF_PAGE_SIZE * 2)
- size = BUF_PAGE_SIZE * 2;
+ if (nr_pages < 2)
+ nr_pages = 2;
- nr_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE);
+ size = nr_pages * BUF_PAGE_SIZE;
/*
* Don't succeed if resizing is disabled, as a reader might be
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from rostedt@goodmis.org are
queue-3.14/ring-buffer-prevent-overflow-of-size-in-ring_buffer_resize.patch
queue-3.14/ring-buffer-use-long-for-nr_pages-to-avoid-overflow-failures.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-05-29 21:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14645587185539@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.