From: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
To: Chen Gang <chengang@emindsoft.com.cn>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, trivial@kernel.org
Cc: kuleshovmail@gmail.com, tony.luck@intel.com,
tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com, will.deacon@arm.com, holt@sgi.com,
ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Chen Gang <gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH trivial] include/linux/memblock.h: Clean up code for several trivial details
Date: Mon, 30 May 2016 07:33:52 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464618832.14627.23.camel@perches.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <574C4C4F.8080609@emindsoft.com.cn>
On Mon, 2016-05-30 at 22:21 +0800, Chen Gang wrote:
> On 5/29/16 23:08, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Sun, 2016-05-29 at 22:36 +0800, chengang@emindsoft.com.cn wrote:
> > > Use "!!" to let the boolean function return boolean value directly.
> > []
> > > diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
> > []
> > > @@ -191,12 +190,12 @@ static inline bool movable_node_is_enabled(void)
> > > static inline bool memblock_is_mirror(struct memblock_region *m)
> > > {
> > > - return m->flags & MEMBLOCK_MIRROR;
> > > + return !!(m->flags & MEMBLOCK_MIRROR);
> > These !! uses are't necessary.
> > The compiler makes the bool return 0 or 1.
> No, they are not necessary. But for me, it will be more clearer, since
> in our kernel (at least in include/linux/), almost all Boolean functions
> use Boolean value or expression for return (and "!!" are often used).
Opinions vary.
There seem to be fewer than 20 !! uses in bool return
functions in include/linux/
Finding the quantity of bool conversions in include/linux
from something other than 0, 1, true, or false to 0 or 1
is not trivial, but it is non-zero and seems rather more
than 20.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-30 14:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-29 14:36 [PATCH trivial] include/linux/memblock.h: Clean up code for several trivial details chengang
2016-05-29 15:08 ` Joe Perches
2016-05-30 14:21 ` Chen Gang
2016-05-30 14:33 ` Joe Perches [this message]
2016-05-30 22:14 ` Chen Gang
2016-05-31 2:06 ` Chen Gang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1464618832.14627.23.camel@perches.com \
--to=joe@perches.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
--cc=chengang@emindsoft.com.cn \
--cc=gang.chen.5i5j@gmail.com \
--cc=holt@sgi.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kuleshovmail@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=trivial@kernel.org \
--cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.