From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: lkp@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput -32.9% regression
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 02:44:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464828278.3161.12.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pos0igdd.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 467 bytes --]
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 08:28 +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> If this report annoyed you, I am sorry about that. We just want to be
> helpful via providing some information. Now I know hackbench is
> sensitive to load_avg changes, thanks a lot for the information.
No no, I meant the other way around ;-) If you're one of the folks
_doing_ performance monitoring, it can be a tad annoying to finding
that the effort you invested was all for naught.
-Mike
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com>
To: "Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
lkp@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Xiaolong Ye <xiaolong.ye@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [lkp] [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput -32.9% regression
Date: Thu, 02 Jun 2016 02:44:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1464828278.3161.12.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87pos0igdd.fsf@yhuang-dev.intel.com>
On Thu, 2016-06-02 at 08:28 +0800, Huang, Ying wrote:
> If this report annoyed you, I am sorry about that. We just want to be
> helpful via providing some information. Now I know hackbench is
> sensitive to load_avg changes, thanks a lot for the information.
No no, I meant the other way around ;-) If you're one of the folks
_doing_ performance monitoring, it can be a tad annoying to finding
that the effort you invested was all for naught.
-Mike
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-06-02 0:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-31 8:20 [sched/fair] 53d3bc773e: hackbench.throughput -32.9% regression kernel test robot
2016-05-31 8:20 ` [lkp] " kernel test robot
2016-05-31 8:34 ` Huang, Ying
2016-05-31 8:34 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-05-31 12:41 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-05-31 12:41 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-01 5:00 ` Huang, Ying
2016-06-01 5:00 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-06-01 8:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-01 8:40 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Peter Zijlstra
2016-06-01 8:53 ` Huang, Ying
2016-06-01 8:53 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-06-01 9:48 ` Mike Galbraith
2016-06-01 9:48 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Mike Galbraith
2016-06-02 0:28 ` Huang, Ying
2016-06-02 0:28 ` [LKP] [lkp] " Huang, Ying
2016-06-02 0:44 ` Mike Galbraith [this message]
2016-06-02 0:44 ` Mike Galbraith
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1464828278.3161.12.camel@gmail.com \
--to=umgwanakikbuti@gmail.com \
--cc=lkp@lists.01.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.