From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: RT trees fail ltp futex_wait04 - culprit=65d8fc777f6d (futex: Remove requirement for lock_page() in get_futex_key()) Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 18:16:59 +0200 Message-ID: <1465057019.4178.0.camel@gmail.com> References: <1465052027.4104.19.camel@gmail.com> <1465056478.4212.3.camel@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Thomas Gleixner , linux-rt-users To: Mel Gorman Return-path: Received: from mail-wm0-f54.google.com ([74.125.82.54]:38558 "EHLO mail-wm0-f54.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750889AbcFDQRE (ORCPT ); Sat, 4 Jun 2016 12:17:04 -0400 Received: by mail-wm0-f54.google.com with SMTP id m124so23381915wme.1 for ; Sat, 04 Jun 2016 09:17:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1465056478.4212.3.camel@gmail.com> Sender: linux-rt-users-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 18:07 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: > Oho, actually, it's not only RT kernels, master with an enterprise like > NOPREEMPT config fails as well, so it's a garden variety regression. > > futex_wake04 1 TFAIL : futex_wake04.c:126: Bug: wait_thread2 did not wake after 30 secs. And again, swiped bits fixed it.