From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: thellstrom@vmware.com, brianp@vmware.com,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, syeh@vmware.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "drm/vmwgfx: Kill some lockdep warnings" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree
Date: Sat, 04 Jun 2016 14:37:02 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14650762226774@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
drm/vmwgfx: Kill some lockdep warnings
to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
drm-vmwgfx-kill-some-lockdep-warnings.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 93cd16817ae5ddcfc548784b51c76bf6d7923442 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 11:24:35 +0200
Subject: drm/vmwgfx: Kill some lockdep warnings
From: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
commit 93cd16817ae5ddcfc548784b51c76bf6d7923442 upstream.
Some global KMS state that is elsewhere protected by the mode_config
mutex here needs to be protected with a local mutex. Remove corresponding
lockdep checks and introduce a new driver-private global_kms_state_mutex,
and make sure its locking order is *after* the crtc locks in order to
avoid having to release those when the new mutex is taken.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Brian Paul <brianp@vmware.com>
Reviewed-by: Sinclair Yeh <syeh@vmware.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h | 1 +
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_scrn.c | 3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_stdu.c | 3 +++
5 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.c
@@ -628,6 +628,7 @@ static int vmw_driver_load(struct drm_de
mutex_init(&dev_priv->cmdbuf_mutex);
mutex_init(&dev_priv->release_mutex);
mutex_init(&dev_priv->binding_mutex);
+ mutex_init(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
rwlock_init(&dev_priv->resource_lock);
ttm_lock_init(&dev_priv->reservation_sem);
spin_lock_init(&dev_priv->hw_lock);
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_drv.h
@@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ struct vmw_private {
struct drm_property *implicit_placement_property;
unsigned num_implicit;
struct vmw_framebuffer *implicit_fb;
+ struct mutex global_kms_state_mutex;
/*
* Context and surface management.
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c
@@ -2143,13 +2143,13 @@ int vmw_kms_fbdev_init_data(struct vmw_p
void vmw_kms_del_active(struct vmw_private *dev_priv,
struct vmw_display_unit *du)
{
- lockdep_assert_held_once(&dev_priv->dev->mode_config.mutex);
-
+ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
if (du->active_implicit) {
if (--(dev_priv->num_implicit) == 0)
dev_priv->implicit_fb = NULL;
du->active_implicit = false;
}
+ mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
}
/**
@@ -2165,8 +2165,7 @@ void vmw_kms_add_active(struct vmw_priva
struct vmw_display_unit *du,
struct vmw_framebuffer *vfb)
{
- lockdep_assert_held_once(&dev_priv->dev->mode_config.mutex);
-
+ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev_priv->num_implicit && dev_priv->implicit_fb);
if (!du->active_implicit && du->is_implicit) {
@@ -2174,6 +2173,7 @@ void vmw_kms_add_active(struct vmw_priva
du->active_implicit = true;
dev_priv->num_implicit++;
}
+ mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
}
/**
@@ -2190,16 +2190,13 @@ bool vmw_kms_crtc_flippable(struct vmw_p
struct drm_crtc *crtc)
{
struct vmw_display_unit *du = vmw_crtc_to_du(crtc);
+ bool ret;
- lockdep_assert_held_once(&dev_priv->dev->mode_config.mutex);
-
- if (!du->is_implicit)
- return true;
-
- if (dev_priv->num_implicit != 1)
- return false;
+ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
+ ret = !du->is_implicit || dev_priv->num_implicit == 1;
+ mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
- return true;
+ return ret;
}
/**
@@ -2214,16 +2211,18 @@ void vmw_kms_update_implicit_fb(struct v
struct vmw_display_unit *du = vmw_crtc_to_du(crtc);
struct vmw_framebuffer *vfb;
- lockdep_assert_held_once(&dev_priv->dev->mode_config.mutex);
+ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
if (!du->is_implicit)
- return;
+ goto out_unlock;
vfb = vmw_framebuffer_to_vfb(crtc->primary->fb);
WARN_ON_ONCE(dev_priv->num_implicit != 1 &&
dev_priv->implicit_fb != vfb);
dev_priv->implicit_fb = vfb;
+out_unlock:
+ mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
}
/**
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_scrn.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_scrn.c
@@ -285,14 +285,17 @@ static int vmw_sou_crtc_set_config(struc
}
/* Only one active implicit frame-buffer at a time. */
+ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
if (sou->base.is_implicit &&
dev_priv->implicit_fb && vfb &&
!(dev_priv->num_implicit == 1 &&
sou->base.active_implicit) &&
dev_priv->implicit_fb != vfb) {
+ mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
DRM_ERROR("Multiple implicit framebuffers not supported.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
+ mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
/* since they always map one to one these are safe */
connector = &sou->base.connector;
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_stdu.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_stdu.c
@@ -553,12 +553,15 @@ static int vmw_stdu_crtc_set_config(stru
}
/* Only one active implicit frame-buffer at a time. */
+ mutex_lock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
if (!turning_off && stdu->base.is_implicit && dev_priv->implicit_fb &&
!(dev_priv->num_implicit == 1 && stdu->base.active_implicit)
&& dev_priv->implicit_fb != vfb) {
+ mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
DRM_ERROR("Multiple implicit framebuffers not supported.\n");
return -EINVAL;
}
+ mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->global_kms_state_mutex);
/* Since they always map one to one these are safe */
connector = &stdu->base.connector;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from thellstrom@vmware.com are
queue-4.6/drm-vmwgfx-kill-some-lockdep-warnings.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-06-04 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14650762226774@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=brianp@vmware.com \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=syeh@vmware.com \
--cc=thellstrom@vmware.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.