From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andy Shevchenko Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] gpio: pca953x: enfore type for i2c_smbus_write_word_data() Date: Wed, 08 Jun 2016 12:06:19 +0300 Message-ID: <1465376779.1767.116.camel@linux.intel.com> References: <1464721423-10969-1-git-send-email-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> <1464784534.1767.11.camel@linux.intel.com> <1464878595.1767.28.camel@linux.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mga11.intel.com ([192.55.52.93]:35236 "EHLO mga11.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755953AbcFHJFX (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jun 2016 05:05:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-gpio-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Walleij Cc: Yong Li , "linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org" , Phil Reid On Wed, 2016-06-08 at 10:03 +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > Linus, by the way do we need to go with this to stable and -rc2? > > If it's just a compilation warning, no. > > If it is causing real regressions on hardware yes. I believe it's just a static analyzer warning. > > I have applied it for the next kernel as of now. Thanks! -- Andy Shevchenko Intel Finland Oy