diff for duplicates of <1465482496.3203.73.camel@synopsys.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 0db06f7..962b9e4 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 Hi Daniel,
 
-On Thu, 2016-06-09@15:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
->?
+On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 15:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
+> 
 > The fake implementation is fundamentally racy, and I don't want to write
 > helpers which can't be used correctly. Anyway I think without this patch
 > (or something similar) arcpgu will stall badly with the new nonblocking
@@ -14,3 +14,7 @@ Sure I will happily test this series.
 The only question then is what should I use as a proper base?
 
 -Alexey
+_______________________________________________
+linux-snps-arc mailing list
+linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index d07a5b6..0e3e5d2 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -8,16 +8,22 @@
  "ref\020160609132327.GQ3363@phenom.ffwll.local\0"
  "ref\01465478829.3203.68.camel@synopsys.com\0"
  "ref\020160609135222.GS3363@phenom.ffwll.local\0"
- "From\0Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com (Alexey Brodkin)\0"
- "Subject\0[PATCH 03/27] drm/arc: Actually bother with handling atomic events.\0"
+ "From\0Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>\0"
+ "Subject\0Re: [PATCH 03/27] drm/arc: Actually bother with handling atomic events.\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:29:02 +0000\0"
- "To\0linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0daniel@ffwll.ch <daniel@ffwll.ch>\0"
+ "Cc\0daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>"
+  maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
+  CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com <CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com>
+  dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
+  daniel.vetter@intel.com <daniel.vetter@intel.com>
+ " linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Hi Daniel,\n"
  "\n"
- "On Thu, 2016-06-09@15:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:\n"
- ">?\n"
+ "On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 15:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:\n"
+ ">\302\240\n"
  "> The fake implementation is fundamentally racy, and I don't want to write\n"
  "> helpers which can't be used correctly. Anyway I think without this patch\n"
  "> (or something similar) arcpgu will stall badly with the new nonblocking\n"
@@ -29,6 +35,10 @@
  "Sure I will happily test this series.\n"
  "The only question then is what should I use as a proper base?\n"
  "\n"
- -Alexey
+ "-Alexey\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-snps-arc mailing list\n"
+ "linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
 
-b211ad0d86b28bc4c3af6c95d9e76e4b48547a1f2d0eeee644cefa7f0ae90109
+a9747d85470323119439db26b5a872d01526de98257a15399c38868989883752
