From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E3573257; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:59:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u5DAxiHT009020; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:59:44 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id U3T9323gqrkE; Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:59:44 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u5DAxdO6009015 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:59:40 +0100 Message-ID: <1465575223.13979.188.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Trevor Woerner In-Reply-To: <20160610160710.GA18625@openSUSE-i7.site> References: <1465572809.13979.185.camel@linuxfoundation.org> <20160610160710.GA18625@openSUSE-i7.site> Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:13:43 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Cc: openembedded-architecture , bitbake-devel Subject: Re: Multi-configuration builds X-BeenThere: bitbake-devel@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussion that advance bitbake development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:59:48 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 12:07 -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: > On Fri 2016-06-10 @ 04:33:29 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > A few people have asked about multi-machine builds. > > Do you envision each config also pointing to individual bblayer > configurations > too? I.e. if I'm building for 3 different MACHINEs, with 3 different > configs > (local.conf?), then there would also be 3 different bblayers.conf's? No, there is one local.conf and one bblayers.conf file and then three different multiconfig files, each one of which sets a different MACHINE. Would people really want to support different bblayer files? That would complicate things quite a lot :/. Cheers, Richard