From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id 1A6F5E00C8B; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 03:10:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from dan.rpsys.net (5751f4a1.skybroadband.com [87.81.244.161]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9604AE00C7D for ; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 03:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u5FAAkEU011059; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:10:46 +0100 Received: from dan.rpsys.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (dan.rpsys.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id hSryxWXO282R; Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:10:46 +0100 (BST) Received: from hex ([192.168.3.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by dan.rpsys.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1) with ESMTP id u5FAAiCh011049 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:10:45 +0100 Message-ID: <1465985444.13979.221.camel@linuxfoundation.org> From: Richard Purdie To: Alexander Kanavin , poky@yoctoproject.org Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 11:10:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1465465884-26334-1-git-send-email-alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> References: <1465465884-26334-1-git-send-email-alexander.kanavin@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.5-1ubuntu3.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH] maintainers.inc: add missing recipes X-BeenThere: poky@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Poky build system developer discussion & patch submission for meta-yocto List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2016 10:10:57 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 12:51 +0300, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > Most of the additions are these: > 1) Missing variants for a recipe (-native, -cross, etc.) > 2) Recently added recipes; the maintainer is typically the person > who submitted the addition > > If you disagree with the assignments, speak up! I'm a little concerned with this patch. We should only be adding native or nativesdk recipes which are native or nativesdk only. We don't have very many of those. In the other cases, we should be able to infer the same maintainer from the target version. Could you have a quick look over these entries and see if we should be inferring some of them suggesting a problem in that inferring code, wherever it may be. I just worry we'd end up adding all -native and nativesdk- variants to this file which seems a bit pointless... Cheers, Richard