All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
diff for duplicates of <1466095574.4442.53.camel@synopsys.com>

diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt
index 5dfd536..7903765 100644
--- a/a/1.txt
+++ b/N1/1.txt
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 Hi Marek,
 
-We used to use?of_reserved_mem_device_init() in such a context in GPU drivers:
+We used to use of_reserved_mem_device_init() in such a context in GPU drivers:
 -------------------->8-------------------
 	/* Get the optional framebuffer memory resource */
 	ret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(drm->dev);
@@ -12,8 +12,8 @@ The point is we may have a dedicated reserved memory area or may not have (depen
 Our expectation is if reserved memory area is missing then of_reserved_mem_device_init()
 just returns -ENODEV and it used to work like this.
 
-Now with your commit?59ce4039727e "of: reserved_mem: add support for using more than one region for given device"
-behavior is different.?of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx() has this:
+Now with your commit 59ce4039727e "of: reserved_mem: add support for using more than one region for given device"
+behavior is different. of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx() has this:
 -------------------->8-------------------
 	target = of_parse_phandle(np, "memory-region", idx);
 	if (!target)
@@ -21,10 +21,14 @@ behavior is different.?of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx() has this:
 -------------------->8-------------------
 
 So I'm wondering which part should be fixed:
-?1)?of_reserved_mem itself or
-?2) users of of_reserved_mem_device_init()
+ 1) of_reserved_mem itself or
+ 2) users of of_reserved_mem_device_init()
 
 Any thoughts?
 
 Regards,
 Alexey
+_______________________________________________
+linux-snps-arc mailing list
+linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org
+http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest
index c9c7ec9..69df264 100644
--- a/a/content_digest
+++ b/N1/content_digest
@@ -1,12 +1,19 @@
- "From\0Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com (Alexey Brodkin)\0"
+ "From\0Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>\0"
  "Subject\0of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx() returns -EINVAL if \"memory-region\" is missing\0"
  "Date\0Thu, 16 Jun 2016 16:47:08 +0000\0"
- "To\0linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org\0"
+ "To\0m.szyprowski@samsung.com <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>\0"
+ "Cc\0robh@kernel.org <robh@kernel.org>"
+  s.nawrocki@samsung.com <s.nawrocki@samsung.com>
+  airlied@linux.ie <airlied@linux.ie>
+  Liviu.Dudau@arm.com <Liviu.Dudau@arm.com>
+  dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
+  daniel@ffwll.ch <daniel@ffwll.ch>
+ " linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org <linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org>\0"
  "\00:1\0"
  "b\0"
  "Hi Marek,\n"
  "\n"
- "We used to use?of_reserved_mem_device_init() in such a context in GPU drivers:\n"
+ "We used to use\302\240of_reserved_mem_device_init() in such a context in GPU drivers:\n"
  "-------------------->8-------------------\n"
  "\t/* Get the optional framebuffer memory resource */\n"
  "\tret = of_reserved_mem_device_init(drm->dev);\n"
@@ -18,8 +25,8 @@
  "Our expectation is if reserved memory area is missing then of_reserved_mem_device_init()\n"
  "just returns -ENODEV and it used to work like this.\n"
  "\n"
- "Now with your commit?59ce4039727e \"of: reserved_mem: add support for using more than one region for given device\"\n"
- "behavior is different.?of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx() has this:\n"
+ "Now with your commit\302\24059ce4039727e \"of: reserved_mem: add support for using more than one region for given device\"\n"
+ "behavior is different.\302\240of_reserved_mem_device_init_by_idx() has this:\n"
  "-------------------->8-------------------\n"
  "\ttarget = of_parse_phandle(np, \"memory-region\", idx);\n"
  "\tif (!target)\n"
@@ -27,12 +34,16 @@
  "-------------------->8-------------------\n"
  "\n"
  "So I'm wondering which part should be fixed:\n"
- "?1)?of_reserved_mem itself or\n"
- "?2) users of of_reserved_mem_device_init()\n"
+ "\302\2401)\302\240of_reserved_mem itself or\n"
+ "\302\2402) users of of_reserved_mem_device_init()\n"
  "\n"
  "Any thoughts?\n"
  "\n"
  "Regards,\n"
- Alexey
+ "Alexey\n"
+ "_______________________________________________\n"
+ "linux-snps-arc mailing list\n"
+ "linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org\n"
+ http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc
 
-6513f56f01f71e3c5e063377a662d4dd78a7e9dcac98b48edf711595175b5c7e
+20f87c836de229c07aee4079fd3268cf12869aeba52f0b4a8f00dfed18035797

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.