From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leon Romanovsky Subject: [PATCH rdma-next 0/2] Small fix and code refactoring for mlx5 Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 15:33:30 +0300 Message-ID: <1466166812-730-1-git-send-email-leon@kernel.org> Return-path: Sender: linux-rdma-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: dledford-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Cc: linux-rdma-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Hi Doug, These two patches are intended for rdna-next and related to mlx5 only. Despite the fact that these patches were tested and found that no merge conflict is expected between IB and net parts of mlx5 driver, we would like to ask you to take into your tree this refactored code. Such move will give us enough time to respond in case other developers (non-Mellanox) will send patches in that area and will cause to merge conflicts during Linus's merge window. Thanks Artemy Kovalyov (2): IB/mlx5: Fix MODIFY_QP command input structure {net, IB}/mlx5: Refactor internal SRQ API drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/srq.c | 102 ++++------ drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/srq.c | 265 ++++++++++++++------------ include/linux/mlx5/driver.h | 6 +- include/linux/mlx5/qp.h | 5 +- include/linux/mlx5/srq.h | 25 +++ 5 files changed, 218 insertions(+), 185 deletions(-) -- 2.1.4 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rdma" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html