All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>
To: "Maxin B. John" <maxin.john@intel.com>,
	openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Cc: "Lock, Joshua" <joshua.g.lock@intel.com>,
	"Bartosh, Eduard" <eduard.bartosh@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] depexp.py: port to gtk+3
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 17:31:16 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1466181076.25557.20.camel@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1466180018.25557.18.camel@linuxfoundation.org>

On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 17:13 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-06-17 at 17:19 +0300, Maxin B. John wrote:
> > Update depexp.py to support gtk+3
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Maxin B. John <maxin.john@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  bitbake/lib/bb/ui/depexp.py | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
> > --
> > ----------
> >  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/bitbake/lib/bb/ui/depexp.py
> > b/bitbake/lib/bb/ui/depexp.py
> > index 240aafc..8f603dd 100644
> > --- a/bitbake/lib/bb/ui/depexp.py
> > +++ b/bitbake/lib/bb/ui/depexp.py
> > @@ -18,14 +18,15 @@
> >  # 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
> 
> Thanks for this, it certainly improves something which is currently
> much more broken. I've queued in master-next. Note that this really
> should go to the bitbake list in future.
> 
> I also am a bit worried about the time.sleep(), am seeing if we can
> figure out how to avoid that before it merges...

Looks like its the gtk.init_check() in the bitbake thread before we
setup a separate gtk thread. The check needs to move to the other
thread with appropriate error handling, then we don't need the sleep.

The bitbake main thread needs to likely wait on the gtk init having
finished too.

Cheers,

Richard



  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-17 16:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-17 14:19 [PATCH] depexp.py: port to gtk+3 Maxin B. John
2016-06-17 16:13 ` Richard Purdie
2016-06-17 16:31   ` Richard Purdie [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-06-17 14:41 Maxin B. John

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1466181076.25557.20.camel@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=eduard.bartosh@intel.com \
    --cc=joshua.g.lock@intel.com \
    --cc=maxin.john@intel.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.