From: Ulrich Obergfell <uobergfe@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Jones <drjones@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
dzickus@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, mingo@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] watchdog: control hard lockup detection default
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2014 07:44:54 -0400 (EDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <146661093.17248776.1406202294303.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53D0ED70.4070800@redhat.com>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>
>To: "Ulrich Obergfell" <uobergfe@redhat.com>
>Cc: "Andrew Jones" <drjones@redhat.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, dzickus@redhat.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, >mingo@redhat.com
>Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2014 1:26:40 PM
>Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] watchdog: control hard lockup detection default
>
>Il 24/07/2014 13:18, Ulrich Obergfell ha scritto:
>>>> >> The running kernel still has the ability to enable/disable at any
>>>> >> time with /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog us usual. However even
>>>> >> when the default has been overridden /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
>>>> >> will initially show '1'. To truly turn it on one must disable/enable
>>>> >> it, i.e.
>>>> >> echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
>>>> >> echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog
>>> >
>>> > Why is it hard to make this show the right value? :)
>>> >
>>> > Paolo
>> 'echo 1 > /proc/sys/kernel/nmi_watchdog' enables both - hard lockup and
>> soft lockup detection. watchdog_enable_all_cpus() starts a 'watchdog/N'
>> thread for each CPU. If the kernel runs on a bare metal system where the
>> processor does not have a PMU, or when perf_event_create_kernel_counter()
>> returns failure to watchdog_nmi_enable(), or when the kernel runs as a
>> guest on a hypervisor that does not emulate a PMU, then the 'watchdog/N'
>> threads are still active for soft lockup detection. Patch 2/3 essentially
>> makes watchdog_nmi_enable() behave in the same way as if -ENOENT would
>> have been returned by perf_event_create_kernel_counter(). This is then
>> reported via a console message.
>>
>> NMI watchdog: disabled (cpu0): hardware events not enabled
>>
>> It's hard say what _is_ 'the right value' (because lockup detection is
>> then enabled 'partially'), regardless of whether patch 2/3 is applied
>> or not.
>
> But this means that it is not possible to re-enable softlockup detection
> only. I think that should be the effect of echo 0 + echo 1, if
> hardlockup detection was disabled by either the command line or patch 3.
>
> Paolo
The idea was to give the user two options to override the effect of patch 3/3.
Either via the kernel command line ('nmi_watchdog=') at boot time or via /proc
('echo 0' + 'echo 1') when the system is up and running.
Regards,
Uli
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-24 11:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-24 10:13 [PATCH 0/3] watchdog: kvm: disable hard lockup detection by default Andrew Jones
2014-07-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 1/3] watchdog: fix print-once on enable Andrew Jones
2014-07-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 2/3] watchdog: control hard lockup detection default Andrew Jones
2014-07-24 10:46 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-24 11:18 ` Ulrich Obergfell
2014-07-24 11:26 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-24 11:44 ` Ulrich Obergfell [this message]
2014-07-24 11:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-24 12:02 ` Ulrich Obergfell
2014-07-25 8:32 ` Ulrich Obergfell
2014-07-25 11:25 ` Andrew Jones
2014-07-30 13:43 ` Don Zickus
2014-07-30 14:16 ` Paolo Bonzini
2014-07-30 17:07 ` Don Zickus
2014-08-08 13:53 ` [PATCH v2 " Andrew Jones
2014-07-24 10:13 ` [PATCH 3/3] kvm: ensure hard lockup detection is disabled by default Andrew Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=146661093.17248776.1406202294303.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com \
--to=uobergfe@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=drjones@redhat.com \
--cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.