From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: fw@strlen.de, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hawkes@google.com,
pablo@netfilter.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "netfilter: x_tables: don't move to non-existent next rule" has been added to the 4.4-stable tree
Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2016 14:18:58 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <146663033835222@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
netfilter: x_tables: don't move to non-existent next rule
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
netfilter-x_tables-don-t-move-to-non-existent-next-rule.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From f24e230d257af1ad7476c6e81a8dc3127a74204e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2016 14:17:21 +0200
Subject: netfilter: x_tables: don't move to non-existent next rule
From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
commit f24e230d257af1ad7476c6e81a8dc3127a74204e upstream.
Ben Hawkes says:
In the mark_source_chains function (net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c) it
is possible for a user-supplied ipt_entry structure to have a large
next_offset field. This field is not bounds checked prior to writing a
counter value at the supplied offset.
Base chains enforce absolute verdict.
User defined chains are supposed to end with an unconditional return,
xtables userspace adds them automatically.
But if such return is missing we will move to non-existent next rule.
Reported-by: Ben Hawkes <hawkes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c | 8 +++++---
net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c | 4 ++++
net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/arp_tables.c
@@ -439,6 +439,8 @@ static int mark_source_chains(const stru
size = e->next_offset;
e = (struct arpt_entry *)
(entry0 + pos + size);
+ if (pos + size >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
e->counters.pcnt = pos;
pos += size;
} else {
@@ -461,6 +463,8 @@ static int mark_source_chains(const stru
} else {
/* ... this is a fallthru */
newpos = pos + e->next_offset;
+ if (newpos >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
}
e = (struct arpt_entry *)
(entry0 + newpos);
@@ -691,10 +695,8 @@ static int translate_table(struct xt_tab
}
}
- if (!mark_source_chains(newinfo, repl->valid_hooks, entry0)) {
- duprintf("Looping hook\n");
+ if (!mark_source_chains(newinfo, repl->valid_hooks, entry0))
return -ELOOP;
- }
/* Finally, each sanity check must pass */
i = 0;
--- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
@@ -520,6 +520,8 @@ mark_source_chains(const struct xt_table
size = e->next_offset;
e = (struct ipt_entry *)
(entry0 + pos + size);
+ if (pos + size >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
e->counters.pcnt = pos;
pos += size;
} else {
@@ -541,6 +543,8 @@ mark_source_chains(const struct xt_table
} else {
/* ... this is a fallthru */
newpos = pos + e->next_offset;
+ if (newpos >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
}
e = (struct ipt_entry *)
(entry0 + newpos);
--- a/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c
@@ -532,6 +532,8 @@ mark_source_chains(const struct xt_table
size = e->next_offset;
e = (struct ip6t_entry *)
(entry0 + pos + size);
+ if (pos + size >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
e->counters.pcnt = pos;
pos += size;
} else {
@@ -553,6 +555,8 @@ mark_source_chains(const struct xt_table
} else {
/* ... this is a fallthru */
newpos = pos + e->next_offset;
+ if (newpos >= newinfo->size)
+ return 0;
}
e = (struct ip6t_entry *)
(entry0 + newpos);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from fw@strlen.de are
queue-4.4/netfilter-x_tables-add-and-use-xt_check_entry_offsets.patch
queue-4.4/netfilter-x_tables-assert-minimum-target-size.patch
queue-4.4/netfilter-x_tables-add-compat-version-of-xt_check_entry_offsets.patch
queue-4.4/netfilter-x_tables-check-for-bogus-target-offset.patch
queue-4.4/netfilter-x_tables-validate-e-target_offset-early.patch
queue-4.4/netfilter-x_tables-validate-targets-of-jumps.patch
queue-4.4/netfilter-x_tables-don-t-move-to-non-existent-next-rule.patch
queue-4.4/netfilter-x_tables-kill-check_entry-helper.patch
queue-4.4/netfilter-x_tables-make-sure-e-next_offset-covers-remaining-blob-size.patch
queue-4.4/netfilter-x_tables-check-standard-target-size-too.patch
queue-4.4/netfilter-x_tables-validate-all-offsets-and-sizes-in-a-rule.patch
queue-4.4/netfilter-x_tables-fix-unconditional-helper.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-06-22 21:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=146663033835222@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=fw@strlen.de \
--cc=hawkes@google.com \
--cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.