All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Randle, William C" <william.c.randle@intel.com>
To: "richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org"
	<richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org>,
	 "Zhou, Li (Wind River)" <li.zhou@windriver.com>,
	"openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org"
	<openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] python3: correct the multilib support patch
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 15:44:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467215048.2888.43.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467181987.8590.105.camel@linuxfoundation.org>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1820 bytes --]

On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 07:33 +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:

On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 11:12 +0800, Li Zhou wrote:


When python3 rebased its multilib patch, the hard coded "lib" path
isn't really changed because of the rebasing's error, and cause
phthon3's failure when running on 64bit platforms as below:
Could not find platform independent libraries <prefix>
Could not find platform dependent libraries <exec_prefix>
Consider setting $PYTHONHOME to <prefix>[:<exec_prefix>]
Fatal Python error: Py_Initialize: Unable to get the locale encoding
ImportError: No module named 'encodings'

Here correct the rebasing error and solve this issue.

Signed-off-by: Li Zhou <li.zhou@windriver.com<mailto:li.zhou@windriver.com>>
---
 ...ython3-correct-the-multilib-support-patch.patch | 47
++++++++++++++++++++++
 meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3_3.5.1.bb      |  1 +
 2 files changed, 48 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 meta/recipes-devtools/python/python3/0001-python3
-correct-the-multilib-support-patch.patch




Don't we want to correct the "bad" patch rather than adding an
additional patch? Or did I misunderstand the problem?

Also, are there some automated tests we should be adding to catch this
kind of problem? I'm a little worried none of our testing caught this.

Cheers,

Richard


I would agree that since the original patch has not been accepted upstream,  it would make the most sense to just regenerate it.

In addition, there are a couple of other places in getpath.c that have a hard coded "lib/". Have you verified those are correct as is? (I.e., ~line 706 'L:lib/pyhton00.zip"' and ~line 718 'L"lib/lib-dynload"'. Seems like the second case should use code similar other palces lib-dynload is used in the file that uses lib_python to build the path.)

    -Bill

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2391 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-29 15:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-29  3:12 [PATCH] python3: correct the multilib support patch Li Zhou
2016-06-29  6:33 ` Richard Purdie
2016-06-29 15:44   ` Randle, William C [this message]
2016-06-29 22:47     ` Dan McGregor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1467215048.2888.43.camel@intel.com \
    --to=william.c.randle@intel.com \
    --cc=li.zhou@windriver.com \
    --cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
    --cc=richard.purdie@linuxfoundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.