All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org
Subject: [Intel-wired-lan] Question on i40e PCIe relaxed ordering (RO)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 13:32:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467232362.3733.23.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467231519.3404.11.camel@gmail.com>

On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 13:18 -0700, Greg wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 13:05 -0700, tndave wrote:
> > Hi,
> >?
> > Running iperf tcp test on 2 sparc systems with i40e connected back to
> > back, I see huge number of 'port.rx_dropped' (on iperf server). Based
> on
> > past experience with ixgbe, this could very well because of PCIe RO
> > (relaxed ordering) not enabled.
> >?
> > I am trying to confirm RO is enabled. i40e datasheet mentioned RO
> > settings in 3 different sections:
> >?
> > 1. section 10.2.2.2.38 PCIe Global Config 2 - GLPCI_CNF2 register
> > contains global status fields of PCIe configuration. The bit 0 of the
> > register is "RO_DIS". If this bit is set to 1 RO is disabled.
> >?
> > RO_DIS in my setup is 0 imply RO is not disabled.
> >?
> > 2. section 12.3.5.5 Device Control Register (0xA8; RW) has bit 4
> > that enable/disable RO. This is pcie cap register.
> >?
> > In my i40e pcie config space value at offset 0xA8 is "2110". i.e 4th
> bit
> > set to 1 imply RO is enabled.
> >?
> > 3. section 3.1.2.7.2 mentions some relaxed ordering rules
> > e.g. "The GLLAN_RCTL.RXDESCRDROEN bit (loaded from NVM) enables relaxed
> > ordering for Rx descriptor reads"
> >?
> > However, GLLAN_RCTL register definition has not bit like RXDESCRDROEN.
> > Same goes for GLLAN_TCTL.TXDESCRDROEN.
> >?
> > Am I missing anything? please advise.
> 
> I would try posting this question to the e1000 developer list over at
> Source Forge.? The Intel customer support folks used to monitor that
> list closely when I was there, hopefully they still are.

We are supposed to be monitoring both lists, but just in case I have added
e1000-devel list...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.osuosl.org/pipermail/intel-wired-lan/attachments/20160629/401d5a31/attachment.asc>

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
To: Greg <gvrose8192@gmail.com>, tndave <tushar.n.dave@oracle.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"e1000-devel@lists.sf.net" <e1000-devel@lists.sf.net>,
	intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: Question on i40e PCIe relaxed ordering (RO)
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2016 13:32:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467232362.3733.23.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1467231519.3404.11.camel@gmail.com>


[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1707 bytes --]

On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 13:18 -0700, Greg wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-29 at 13:05 -0700, tndave wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Running iperf tcp test on 2 sparc systems with i40e connected back to
> > back, I see huge number of 'port.rx_dropped' (on iperf server). Based
> on
> > past experience with ixgbe, this could very well because of PCIe RO
> > (relaxed ordering) not enabled.
> > 
> > I am trying to confirm RO is enabled. i40e datasheet mentioned RO
> > settings in 3 different sections:
> > 
> > 1. section 10.2.2.2.38 PCIe Global Config 2 - GLPCI_CNF2 register
> > contains global status fields of PCIe configuration. The bit 0 of the
> > register is "RO_DIS". If this bit is set to 1 RO is disabled.
> > 
> > RO_DIS in my setup is 0 imply RO is not disabled.
> > 
> > 2. section 12.3.5.5 Device Control Register (0xA8; RW) has bit 4
> > that enable/disable RO. This is pcie cap register.
> > 
> > In my i40e pcie config space value at offset 0xA8 is "2110". i.e 4th
> bit
> > set to 1 imply RO is enabled.
> > 
> > 3. section 3.1.2.7.2 mentions some relaxed ordering rules
> > e.g. "The GLLAN_RCTL.RXDESCRDROEN bit (loaded from NVM) enables relaxed
> > ordering for Rx descriptor reads"
> > 
> > However, GLLAN_RCTL register definition has not bit like RXDESCRDROEN.
> > Same goes for GLLAN_TCTL.TXDESCRDROEN.
> > 
> > Am I missing anything? please advise.
> 
> I would try posting this question to the e1000 developer list over at
> Source Forge.  The Intel customer support folks used to monitor that
> list closely when I was there, hopefully they still are.

We are supposed to be monitoring both lists, but just in case I have added
e1000-devel list...

[-- Attachment #1.2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 387 bytes --]

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Attend Shape: An AT&T Tech Expo July 15-16. Meet us at AT&T Park in San
Francisco, CA to explore cutting-edge tech and listen to tech luminaries
present their vision of the future. This family event has something for
everyone, including kids. Get more information and register today.
http://sdm.link/attshape

[-- Attachment #3: Type: text/plain, Size: 257 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
E1000-devel mailing list
E1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/e1000-devel
To learn more about Intel&#174; Ethernet, visit http://communities.intel.com/community/wired

  reply	other threads:[~2016-06-29 20:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-29 20:05 [Intel-wired-lan] Question on i40e PCIe relaxed ordering (RO) tndave
2016-06-29 20:05 ` tndave
2016-06-29 20:18 ` [Intel-wired-lan] " Greg
2016-06-29 20:18   ` Greg
2016-06-29 20:32   ` Jeff Kirsher [this message]
2016-06-29 20:32     ` Jeff Kirsher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1467232362.3733.23.camel@intel.com \
    --to=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=intel-wired-lan@osuosl.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.