From: Roger Willcocks <roger@filmlight.ltd.uk>
To: Chris Murphy <lists@colorremedies.com>
Cc: "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
Wang Shilong <wshilong@ddn.com>,
"xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Bad Metadata performances for XFS?
Date: Wed, 06 Jul 2016 12:49:29 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467805769.7631.249.camel@filmlight.ltd.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJCQCtRiznrWAmCEgd=uMETnBubh1ZttGP4xF9PLu0_j7XBRuw@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 2016-07-05 at 14:34 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 4, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Wang Shilong <wshilong@ddn.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I understand that this is single thread Limit, but I guess there are some
> > other Limit here, because even single thread creating 50W files speed
> > is twice than 200W files.
>
> Watts or Wolframs (tungsten)?
>
> 50W!=50000. You could write it as 50k and 200k. It's unlikely to get
> confused with 50K and 200K, which are temperatures, because of
> context. But W makes no sense.
>
>
>
I suspect it's an abbreviation for the (Chinese) unit 'wan'
https://www.quora.com/Why-do-Chinese-people-count-in-units-of-10-000
so it makes perfect sense but it's not an SI unit.
--
Roger
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-07-06 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <3ED34739A4E85E4F894367D57617CDEF9ED9518B@LAX-EX-MB2.datadirect.datadirectnet.com>
2016-07-04 22:52 ` Bad Metadata performances for XFS? Dave Chinner
2016-07-05 0:18 ` Dave Chinner
2016-07-05 1:43 ` Wang Shilong
2016-07-05 7:29 ` Dave Chinner
2016-07-05 20:34 ` Chris Murphy
2016-07-06 11:49 ` Roger Willcocks [this message]
2016-07-06 23:05 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1467805769.7631.249.camel@filmlight.ltd.uk \
--to=roger@filmlight.ltd.uk \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lists@colorremedies.com \
--cc=wshilong@ddn.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.