All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org,
	mingo@kernel.org, fweisbec@redhat.com, wanpeng.li@hotmail.com,
	efault@gmx.de, tglx@linutronix.de, rkrcmar@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] irqtime: drop local_irq_save/restore from irqtime_account_irq
Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2016 11:56:49 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1467993409.13253.31.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4738023a-adcf-69b5-5856-12c4dc619363@redhat.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2223 bytes --]

On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 16:34 +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> On 08/07/2016 15:19, Rik van Riel wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-07-08 at 14:30 +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 03:35:50PM -0400, riel@redhat.com wrote:
> > > > From: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> > > > 
> > > > Drop local_irq_save/restore from irqtime_account_irq.
> > > > Instead, have softirq and hardirq track their time spent
> > > > independently, with the softirq code subtracting hardirq
> > > > time that happened during the duration of the softirq run.
> > > > 
> > > > The softirq code can be interrupted by hardirq code at
> > > > any point in time, but it can check whether it got a
> > > > consistent snapshot of the timekeeping variables it wants,
> > > > and loop around in the unlikely case that it did not.
> > > > 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
> > > 
> > > So the purpose is to get rid of local_irq_save/restore()?
> > > Is it really worth such complication?
> > 
> > local_irq_save/restore are quite slow, and look like the
> > largest source of overhead in irq time accounting.
> 
> I'm looking at an upstream tree, without your patches applied,
> but it seems to me that irqtime_account_irq is always called with
> interrupts disabled:
> 
> irqtime_account_irq
> 	-> account_irq_enter_time
> 		-> __irq_enter
> 			-> HARDIRQ_ENTER	[1]
> 			-> irq_enter		[3]
> 		-> __do_softirq			[1]
> 	-> account_irq_exit_time
> 		-> __do_softirq			[1]
> 		-> __irq_exit
> 			-> HARDIRQ_EXIT		[1]
> 		-> irq_exit			[2]
> 
> 	[1] = does local_irq_disable/enable
> 	[2] = contains WARN_ON_ONCE(!irqs_disabled())
> 	[3] = calls rcu_irq_enter(), which checks irqs_disabled()
> 
> I don't think your first two patches change this, so perhaps it's
> enough
> to remove that local_irq-save/restore?  Either this, or
> ENEEDWEEKEND...

I think you are right!

__do_softirq() calls account_irq_enter_time() with irqs
already disabled, and also has irqs disabled when it
calls account_irq_exit_time()

This appears to be true for both ksoftirqd and softirq
from irq context.

This could simplify my patch series a lot :)

-- 

All Rights Reversed.

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2016-07-08 15:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-06-30 19:35 [PATCH v3 0/4] sched,time: fix irq time accounting with nohz_idle riel
2016-06-30 19:35 ` [PATCH 1/4] sched,time: count actually elapsed irq & softirq time riel
2016-07-05 12:40   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-05 13:08     ` Rik van Riel
2016-07-05 14:00       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-05 16:47     ` [PATCH v3 " Rik van Riel
2016-07-06 14:15       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-06-30 19:35 ` [PATCH 2/4] nohz,cputime: replace VTIME_GEN irq time code with IRQ_TIME_ACCOUNTING code riel
2016-06-30 19:35 ` [PATCH 3/4] irqtime: add irq type parameter to irqtime_account_irq riel
2016-06-30 19:35 ` [PATCH 4/4] irqtime: drop local_irq_save/restore from irqtime_account_irq riel
2016-07-08 12:30   ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-08 13:19     ` Rik van Riel
2016-07-08 14:01       ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-08 14:34       ` Paolo Bonzini
2016-07-08 15:56         ` Rik van Riel [this message]
2016-07-08 23:58           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2016-07-05 13:02 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] sched,time: fix irq time accounting with nohz_idle Nikolay Borisov
2016-07-05 13:09   ` Rik van Riel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1467993409.13253.31.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=riel@redhat.com \
    --cc=efault@gmx.de \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@hotmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.