From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, green@linuxhacker.ru, jlayton@poochiereds.net
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] fix EOPENSTALE bug in do_last()" failed to apply to 4.4-stable tree
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:37:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468276651115204@kroah.com> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
>From fac7d1917dfddfa53e98524f0abfbe60252740fe Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2016 11:41:49 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] fix EOPENSTALE bug in do_last()
EOPENSTALE occuring at the last component of a trailing symlink ends up
with do_last() retrying its lookup. After the symlink body has been
discarded. The thing is, all this retry_lookup logics in there is not
needed at all - the upper layers will do the right thing if we simply
return that -EOPENSTALE as we would with any other error. Trying to
microoptimize in do_last() is a lot of headache for no good reason.
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.2+
Tested-by: Oleg Drokin <green@linuxhacker.ru>
Reviewed-and-Tested-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@poochiereds.net>
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
diff --git a/fs/namei.c b/fs/namei.c
index 4c4f95ac8aa5..3d9511e656ab 100644
--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -3166,9 +3166,7 @@ static int do_last(struct nameidata *nd,
int acc_mode = op->acc_mode;
unsigned seq;
struct inode *inode;
- struct path save_parent = { .dentry = NULL, .mnt = NULL };
struct path path;
- bool retried = false;
int error;
nd->flags &= ~LOOKUP_PARENT;
@@ -3211,7 +3209,6 @@ static int do_last(struct nameidata *nd,
return -EISDIR;
}
-retry_lookup:
if (open_flag & (O_CREAT | O_TRUNC | O_WRONLY | O_RDWR)) {
error = mnt_want_write(nd->path.mnt);
if (!error)
@@ -3292,23 +3289,14 @@ finish_lookup:
if (unlikely(error))
return error;
- if ((nd->flags & LOOKUP_RCU) || nd->path.mnt != path.mnt) {
- path_to_nameidata(&path, nd);
- } else {
- save_parent.dentry = nd->path.dentry;
- save_parent.mnt = mntget(path.mnt);
- nd->path.dentry = path.dentry;
-
- }
+ path_to_nameidata(&path, nd);
nd->inode = inode;
nd->seq = seq;
/* Why this, you ask? _Now_ we might have grown LOOKUP_JUMPED... */
finish_open:
error = complete_walk(nd);
- if (error) {
- path_put(&save_parent);
+ if (error)
return error;
- }
audit_inode(nd->name, nd->path.dentry, 0);
error = -EISDIR;
if ((open_flag & O_CREAT) && d_is_dir(nd->path.dentry))
@@ -3331,13 +3319,9 @@ finish_open_created:
goto out;
BUG_ON(*opened & FILE_OPENED); /* once it's opened, it's opened */
error = vfs_open(&nd->path, file, current_cred());
- if (!error) {
- *opened |= FILE_OPENED;
- } else {
- if (error == -EOPENSTALE)
- goto stale_open;
+ if (error)
goto out;
- }
+ *opened |= FILE_OPENED;
opened:
error = open_check_o_direct(file);
if (!error)
@@ -3353,26 +3337,7 @@ out:
}
if (got_write)
mnt_drop_write(nd->path.mnt);
- path_put(&save_parent);
return error;
-
-stale_open:
- /* If no saved parent or already retried then can't retry */
- if (!save_parent.dentry || retried)
- goto out;
-
- BUG_ON(save_parent.dentry != dir);
- path_put(&nd->path);
- nd->path = save_parent;
- nd->inode = dir->d_inode;
- save_parent.mnt = NULL;
- save_parent.dentry = NULL;
- if (got_write) {
- mnt_drop_write(nd->path.mnt);
- got_write = false;
- }
- retried = true;
- goto retry_lookup;
}
static int do_tmpfile(struct nameidata *nd, unsigned flags,
reply other threads:[~2016-07-11 23:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1468276651115204@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=green@linuxhacker.ru \
--cc=jlayton@poochiereds.net \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.