All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: chris@chris-wilson.co.uk, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
	peterz@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	torvalds@linux-foundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "locking/ww_mutex: Report recursive ww_mutex locking early" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:47:22 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468277242226198@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    locking/ww_mutex: Report recursive ww_mutex locking early

to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     locking-ww_mutex-report-recursive-ww_mutex-locking-early.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From 0422e83d84ae24b933e4b0d4c1e0f0b4ae8a0a3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2016 21:08:17 +0100
Subject: locking/ww_mutex: Report recursive ww_mutex locking early

From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>

commit 0422e83d84ae24b933e4b0d4c1e0f0b4ae8a0a3b upstream.

Recursive locking for ww_mutexes was originally conceived as an
exception. However, it is heavily used by the DRM atomic modesetting
code. Currently, the recursive deadlock is checked after we have queued
up for a busy-spin and as we never release the lock, we spin until
kicked, whereupon the deadlock is discovered and reported.

A simple solution for the now common problem is to move the recursive
deadlock discovery to the first action when taking the ww_mutex.

Suggested-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1464293297-19777-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 kernel/locking/mutex.c |    9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/kernel/locking/mutex.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/mutex.c
@@ -304,9 +304,6 @@ __mutex_lock_check_stamp(struct mutex *l
 	if (!hold_ctx)
 		return 0;
 
-	if (unlikely(ctx == hold_ctx))
-		return -EALREADY;
-
 	if (ctx->stamp - hold_ctx->stamp <= LONG_MAX &&
 	    (ctx->stamp != hold_ctx->stamp || ctx > hold_ctx)) {
 #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_MUTEXES
@@ -417,6 +414,12 @@ __mutex_lock_common(struct mutex *lock,
 	unsigned long flags;
 	int ret;
 
+	if (use_ww_ctx) {
+		struct ww_mutex *ww = container_of(lock, struct ww_mutex, base);
+		if (unlikely(ww_ctx == READ_ONCE(ww->ctx)))
+			return -EALREADY;
+	}
+
 	preempt_disable();
 	mutex_acquire_nest(&lock->dep_map, subclass, 0, nest_lock, ip);
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from chris@chris-wilson.co.uk are

queue-3.14/locking-ww_mutex-report-recursive-ww_mutex-locking-early.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-07-11 23:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1468277242226198@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.