From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: trond.myklebust@primarydata.com, Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com,
aglo@umich.edu, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "NFS: Fix another OPEN_DOWNGRADE bug" has been added to the 3.14-stable tree
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:47:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468277246160181@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
NFS: Fix another OPEN_DOWNGRADE bug
to the 3.14-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
nfs-fix-another-open_downgrade-bug.patch
and it can be found in the queue-3.14 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From e547f2628327fec6afd2e03b46f113f614cca05b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Jun 2016 19:19:28 -0400
Subject: NFS: Fix another OPEN_DOWNGRADE bug
From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
commit e547f2628327fec6afd2e03b46f113f614cca05b upstream.
Olga Kornievskaia reports that the following test fails to trigger
an OPEN_DOWNGRADE on the wire, and only triggers the final CLOSE.
fd0 = open(foo, RDRW) -- should be open on the wire for "both"
fd1 = open(foo, RDONLY) -- should be open on the wire for "read"
close(fd0) -- should trigger an open_downgrade
read(fd1)
close(fd1)
The issue is that we're missing a check for whether or not the current
state transitioned from an O_RDWR state as opposed to having transitioned
from a combination of O_RDONLY and O_WRONLY.
Reported-by: Olga Kornievskaia <aglo@umich.edu>
Fixes: cd9288ffaea4 ("NFSv4: Fix another bug in the close/open_downgrade code")
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna Schumaker <Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs4proc.c
@@ -2583,12 +2583,11 @@ static void nfs4_close_prepare(struct rp
call_close |= is_wronly;
else if (is_wronly)
calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_WRITE;
+ if (calldata->arg.fmode != (FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE))
+ call_close |= is_rdwr;
} else if (is_rdwr)
calldata->arg.fmode |= FMODE_READ|FMODE_WRITE;
- if (calldata->arg.fmode == 0)
- call_close |= is_rdwr;
-
if (!nfs4_valid_open_stateid(state))
call_close = 0;
spin_unlock(&state->owner->so_lock);
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from trond.myklebust@primarydata.com are
queue-3.14/nfs-fix-another-open_downgrade-bug.patch
queue-3.14/make-nfs_atomic_open-call-d_drop-on-all-open_context-errors.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-07-11 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1468277246160181@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=Anna.Schumaker@Netapp.com \
--cc=aglo@umich.edu \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=trond.myklebust@primarydata.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.