All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: tony.luck@intel.com, arozansk@redhat.com, bp@suse.de,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org,
	mchehab@osg.samsung.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "EDAC, sb_edac: Fix rank lookup on Broadwell" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:48:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468277286249151@kroah.com> (raw)


This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    EDAC, sb_edac: Fix rank lookup on Broadwell

to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     edac-sb_edac-fix-rank-lookup-on-broadwell.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.


>From c7103f650a11328f28b9fa1c95027db331b7774b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 31 May 2016 11:50:28 -0700
Subject: EDAC, sb_edac: Fix rank lookup on Broadwell

From: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>

commit c7103f650a11328f28b9fa1c95027db331b7774b upstream.

Broadwell made a small change to the rank target register moving the
target rank ID field up from bits 16:19 to bits 20:23.

Also found that the offset field grew by one bit in the IVY_BRIDGE to
HASWELL transition, so fix the RIR_OFFSET() macro too.

Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: Aristeu Rozanski <arozansk@redhat.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@osg.samsung.com>
Cc: linux-edac <linux-edac@vger.kernel.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/2943fb819b1f7e396681165db9c12bb3df0e0b16.1464735623.git.tony.luck@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/edac/sb_edac.c |   13 ++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
+++ b/drivers/edac/sb_edac.c
@@ -239,8 +239,11 @@ static const u32 rir_offset[MAX_RIR_RANG
 	{ 0x1a0, 0x1a4, 0x1a8, 0x1ac, 0x1b0, 0x1b4, 0x1b8, 0x1bc },
 };
 
-#define RIR_RNK_TGT(reg)		GET_BITFIELD(reg, 16, 19)
-#define RIR_OFFSET(reg)		GET_BITFIELD(reg,  2, 14)
+#define RIR_RNK_TGT(type, reg) (((type) == BROADWELL) ? \
+	GET_BITFIELD(reg, 20, 23) : GET_BITFIELD(reg, 16, 19))
+
+#define RIR_OFFSET(type, reg) (((type) == HASWELL || (type) == BROADWELL) ? \
+	GET_BITFIELD(reg,  2, 15) : GET_BITFIELD(reg,  2, 14))
 
 /* Device 16, functions 2-7 */
 
@@ -1916,14 +1919,14 @@ static void get_memory_layout(const stru
 				pci_read_config_dword(pvt->pci_tad[i],
 						      rir_offset[j][k],
 						      &reg);
-				tmp_mb = RIR_OFFSET(reg) << 6;
+				tmp_mb = RIR_OFFSET(pvt->info.type, reg) << 6;
 
 				gb = div_u64_rem(tmp_mb, 1024, &mb);
 				edac_dbg(0, "CH#%d RIR#%d INTL#%d, offset %u.%03u GB (0x%016Lx), tgt: %d, reg=0x%08x\n",
 					 i, j, k,
 					 gb, (mb*1000)/1024,
 					 ((u64)tmp_mb) << 20L,
-					 (u32)RIR_RNK_TGT(reg),
+					 (u32)RIR_RNK_TGT(pvt->info.type, reg),
 					 reg);
 			}
 		}
@@ -2256,7 +2259,7 @@ static int get_memory_error_data(struct
 	pci_read_config_dword(pvt->pci_tad[ch_add + base_ch],
 			      rir_offset[n_rir][idx],
 			      &reg);
-	*rank = RIR_RNK_TGT(reg);
+	*rank = RIR_RNK_TGT(pvt->info.type, reg);
 
 	edac_dbg(0, "RIR#%d: channel address 0x%08Lx < 0x%08Lx, RIR interleave %d, index %d\n",
 		 n_rir,


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tony.luck@intel.com are

queue-4.6/edac-sb_edac-fix-rank-lookup-on-broadwell.patch

                 reply	other threads:[~2016-07-11 23:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1468277286249151@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=arozansk@redhat.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-edac@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@osg.samsung.com \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.