From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>, <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "powerpc/iommu: Remove the dependency on EEH struct in DDW mechanism" has been added to the 4.6-stable tree
Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 15:48:25 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1468277305199232@kroah.com> (raw)
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
powerpc/iommu: Remove the dependency on EEH struct in DDW mechanism
to the 4.6-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
powerpc-iommu-remove-the-dependency-on-eeh-struct-in-ddw-mechanism.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.6 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
>From 8445a87f7092bc8336ea1305be9306f26b846d93 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:17:23 -0300
Subject: powerpc/iommu: Remove the dependency on EEH struct in DDW mechanism
From: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
commit 8445a87f7092bc8336ea1305be9306f26b846d93 upstream.
Commit 39baadbf36ce ("powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh information from pci_dn")
changed the pci_dn struct by removing its EEH-related members.
As part of this clean-up, DDW mechanism was modified to read the device
configuration address from eeh_dev struct.
As a consequence, now if we disable EEH mechanism on kernel command-line
for example, the DDW mechanism will fail, generating a kernel oops by
dereferencing a NULL pointer (which turns to be the eeh_dev pointer).
This patch just changes the configuration address calculation on DDW
functions to a manual calculation based on pci_dn members instead of
using eeh_dev-based address.
No functional changes were made. This was tested on pSeries, both
in PHyp and qemu guest.
Fixes: 39baadbf36ce ("powerpc/eeh: Remove eeh information from pci_dn")
Reviewed-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Guilherme G. Piccoli <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c | 24 ++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/iommu.c
@@ -912,7 +912,8 @@ machine_arch_initcall(pseries, find_exis
static int query_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev, const u32 *ddw_avail,
struct ddw_query_response *query)
{
- struct eeh_dev *edev;
+ struct device_node *dn;
+ struct pci_dn *pdn;
u32 cfg_addr;
u64 buid;
int ret;
@@ -923,11 +924,10 @@ static int query_ddw(struct pci_dev *dev
* Retrieve them from the pci device, not the node with the
* dma-window property
*/
- edev = pci_dev_to_eeh_dev(dev);
- cfg_addr = edev->config_addr;
- if (edev->pe_config_addr)
- cfg_addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
- buid = edev->phb->buid;
+ dn = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev);
+ pdn = PCI_DN(dn);
+ buid = pdn->phb->buid;
+ cfg_addr = (pdn->busno << 8) | pdn->devfn;
ret = rtas_call(ddw_avail[0], 3, 5, (u32 *)query,
cfg_addr, BUID_HI(buid), BUID_LO(buid));
@@ -941,7 +941,8 @@ static int create_ddw(struct pci_dev *de
struct ddw_create_response *create, int page_shift,
int window_shift)
{
- struct eeh_dev *edev;
+ struct device_node *dn;
+ struct pci_dn *pdn;
u32 cfg_addr;
u64 buid;
int ret;
@@ -952,11 +953,10 @@ static int create_ddw(struct pci_dev *de
* Retrieve them from the pci device, not the node with the
* dma-window property
*/
- edev = pci_dev_to_eeh_dev(dev);
- cfg_addr = edev->config_addr;
- if (edev->pe_config_addr)
- cfg_addr = edev->pe_config_addr;
- buid = edev->phb->buid;
+ dn = pci_device_to_OF_node(dev);
+ pdn = PCI_DN(dn);
+ buid = pdn->phb->buid;
+ cfg_addr = (pdn->busno << 8) | pdn->devfn;
do {
/* extra outputs are LIOBN and dma-addr (hi, lo) */
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com are
queue-4.6/powerpc-iommu-remove-the-dependency-on-eeh-struct-in-ddw-mechanism.patch
queue-4.6/powerpc-pseries-fix-pci-config-address-for-ddw.patch
reply other threads:[~2016-07-11 23:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1468277305199232@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.